From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Kamil Debski <kamil@wypas.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:38:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2730680.la1ZiRyv91@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602132353.GA12690@roeck-us.net>
On Friday, June 02, 2017 06:23:53 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:13:17PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> > patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).
>
> I lost track where we are with this patch. The above series set did not make
> it, as far as I can see. Is this patch truly dependent on that series, or
> can it be applied separately ? It does apply cleanly.
I think that it can be applied separately (the broken suspend/resume code
will continue to use the old API until the previous patchset is finally
merged and the code in question is removed altogether).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20170424131342epcas5p4cb2f53f6c780119557ff3da56fb8f0a8@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] pwm: pwm-samsung: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-08-21 8:29 ` Thierry Reding
2017-04-24 13:26 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guenter Roeck
2017-04-24 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-02 13:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-07 13:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2017-06-07 21:07 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2730680.la1ZiRyv91@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=kamil@wypas.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.