Re: [PATCH v13 0/4] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>:

On Fri, 15 May 2026 14:29:31 +0200 you wrote:
> Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
> 
> Such intentionally generated warning backtraces are neither desirable
> nor useful for a number of reasons:
> - They can result in overlooked real problems.
> - A warning that suddenly starts to show up in unit tests needs to be
>   investigated and has to be marked to be ignored, for example by
>   adjusting filter scripts. Such filters are ad hoc because there is
>   no real standard format for warnings. On top of that, such filter
>   scripts would require constant maintenance.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v13,1/4] bug/kunit: Core support for suppressing warning backtraces
    (no matching commit)
  - [v13,2/4] kunit: Add backtrace suppression self-tests
    (no matching commit)
  - [v13,3/4] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests
    (no matching commit)
  - [v13,4/4] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/5c1553dd5db3

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html