All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, puranjay@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, alex@ghiti.fr, pulehui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 21:50:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179028660516.2215629.2749041219653206416.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923144216.934701-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:42:16 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> 
> When CFI is enabled, the actual BPF program entry point is shifted
> forward by a CFI preamble. During bpf_jit_free(), this shifted pointer
> causes the wrong ro_header to be fetched, leading to a potential invalid
> memory free.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/93df8ae3267f

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, puranjay@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, alex@ghiti.fr, pulehui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 21:50:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179028660516.2215629.2749041219653206416.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923144216.934701-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:42:16 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> 
> When CFI is enabled, the actual BPF program entry point is shifted
> forward by a CFI preamble. During bpf_jit_free(), this shifted pointer
> causes the wrong ro_header to be fetched, leading to a potential invalid
> memory free.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/93df8ae3267f

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 14:42 [PATCH bpf-next] riscv, bpf: Adjust bpf_func to account for CFI offset in bpf_jit_free Pu Lehui
2026-09-23 14:42 ` Pu Lehui
2026-09-24 15:48 ` Björn Töpel
2026-09-24 15:48   ` Björn Töpel
2026-09-24 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2026-09-24 21:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179028660516.2215629.2749041219653206416.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.