From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hohnbaum@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [0/4] NUMA-Q: remove PCI bus number mangling
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:53:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179150000.1037145229@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021112215305.GZ23425@holomorphy.com>
>>> Also, every PCI bridge in my box has a bus number of 3 so the lookup
>>> table will produce wrong answers every time.
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:46:29PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> Isn't that the local bus number though? The topology functions take
>> global bus numbers, which should be unique ...
>> M.
>
> That bus number mangling scheme is an instance of an approach vetoed
> over a year ago by Dave Miller and others, and does not work for bridges
> because arch code does not get the opportunity to mangle the bus number
> during bridge discovery.
Right, I'm not against the sysdata thing, seems like a much better way
to do it in general (what I did was a quick hack). Was just confused
by the global bus number assertion, but if we use the sysdata stuff,
it's all a non-issue ;-)
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-12 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-12 12:37 [0/4] NUMA-Q: remove PCI bus number mangling William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-11-12 21:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 22:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-12 21:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:53 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-11-12 22:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 0:04 ` Greg KH
2002-11-13 0:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 0:20 ` Greg KH
2002-11-13 0:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 1:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 12:07 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2002-11-13 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 10:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 11:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-01 9:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179150000.1037145229@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.