From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hohnbaum@us.ibm.com,
mochel@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [0/4] NUMA-Q: remove PCI bus number mangling
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:04:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021113000435.GE32274@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021112235824.GG22031@holomorphy.com>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:58:24PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:53:49PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> Right, I'm not against the sysdata thing, seems like a much better way
> >> to do it in general (what I did was a quick hack). Was just confused
> >> by the global bus number assertion, but if we use the sysdata stuff,
> >> it's all a non-issue ;-)
> >
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Non-issue for merging...
> > The pain isn't over yet. =(
> > Core PCI code is assuming unique bus numbers in several places.
>
> Okay, an attempt to remedy this world-breaking braindamage with the
> fewest lines of code:
>
> This alters PCI bus number "clash" detection to compare ->sysdata in
> addition to the numbers. The bus number is not a unique identifier.
Um, why not?
And what would /sys/bus/pci/devices look like if you allow the same
identifiers for different devices? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-13 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-12 12:37 [0/4] NUMA-Q: remove PCI bus number mangling William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-11-12 21:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 22:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-12 21:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-12 22:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 23:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 0:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-11-13 0:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 0:20 ` Greg KH
2002-11-13 0:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 1:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 12:07 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2002-11-13 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 10:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-13 11:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-01 9:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 21:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-12 20:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021113000435.GE32274@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.