* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize
@ 2026-08-28 14:12 Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 14:12 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wenjie Qi @ 2026-08-28 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk, chao
Cc: daehojeong, qwjhust, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie,
sunqiuyang
During a filesystem resize, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS prevents new SIT entries
from being added to the journal and forces existing entries to the SIT
area. However, f2fs_flush_sit_entries() returns early when there are no
new dirty sentries, leaving existing journal entries behind.
After the main area shrinks, a later checkpoint can access a journal
entry whose segment number is outside the new geometry and trigger
f2fs_bug_on().
Only take the zero-dirty fast path when entries may be written back to
the journal. This lets resize drain existing entries through
remove_sits_in_journal() even when there are no new dirty sentries.
Fixes: 04f0b2eaa3b3 ("f2fs: ioctl for removing a range from F2FS")
Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 1e7e745be71d..9f9ce25dd07e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4816,7 +4816,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
down_write(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
- if (!sit_i->dirty_sentries)
+ if (!sit_i->dirty_sentries && to_journal)
goto out;
/*
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize
2026-08-28 14:12 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Wenjie Qi
@ 2026-08-28 14:12 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 18:08 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-24 15:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Daeho Jeong
2026-10-19 15:40 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wenjie Qi @ 2026-08-28 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk, chao
Cc: daehojeong, qwjhust, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie,
sunqiuyang
pinned_area_max_secno is derived from MAIN_SECS(), the zoned device
boundary, and resizable_tail_secno. It is currently recalculated only
at mount and remount, so online resize leaves the pre-resize value
active after MAIN_SECS() changes.
A stale value can allow pinned allocations in sections outside the
new main-area boundary.
Move the calculation to segment.h and call it whenever
update_fs_metadata() changes MAIN_SECS(). This also restores the
previous boundary when a final checkpoint error rolls the resize
metadata back.
Mount option validation compares the tail count with the pre-resize
section count. Recalculating after a shrink below that tail would make
the unsigned subtraction wrap. Reject such a shrink with -EINVAL
before taking resize locks or changing filesystem geometry.
Fixes: c966d29e01bb ("f2fs: support resizable tail section and unify pinned allocation")
Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 7 +++++++
fs/f2fs/segment.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
fs/f2fs/super.c | 15 ++-------------
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index 0a00180c21dc..978e85578c79 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -2326,6 +2326,7 @@ static void update_fs_metadata(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int secs)
SM_I(sbi)->segment_count = (int)SM_I(sbi)->segment_count + segs;
MAIN_SEGS(sbi) = (int)MAIN_SEGS(sbi) + segs;
MAIN_SECS(sbi) += secs;
+ f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
if (sbi->allocate_section_hint > MAIN_SECS(sbi))
sbi->allocate_section_hint = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections = (int)FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections + secs;
@@ -2398,6 +2399,12 @@ int f2fs_resize_fs(struct file *filp, __u64 block_count)
shrunk_blocks = old_block_count - block_count;
secs = div_u64(shrunk_blocks, BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi));
+ if (secs >= MAIN_SECS(sbi) ||
+ F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno >=
+ MAIN_SECS(sbi) - secs) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_drop_write;
+ }
/* stop other GC */
if (!f2fs_down_write_trylock_trace(&sbi->gc_lock, &glc)) {
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index 5949aa5200ac..7c7ca0730d77 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -91,6 +91,22 @@ static inline void sanity_check_seg_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
#define GET_ZONE_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno) \
GET_ZONE_FROM_SEC(sbi, GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno))
+static inline void f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+{
+ sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
+ if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) &&
+ sbi->first_seq_zone_segno != NULL_SEGNO)
+ sbi->pinned_area_max_secno =
+ min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
+ GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
+ sbi->first_seq_zone_segno));
+ if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno)
+ sbi->pinned_area_max_secno =
+ min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
+ MAIN_SECS(sbi) -
+ F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno);
+}
+
#define GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno) \
(SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr + (segno / (sbi)->sums_per_block))
#define GET_SUM_BLKOFF(sbi, segno) (segno % (sbi)->sums_per_block)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 253a579e9d5b..c8f8ecf49635 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -554,17 +554,6 @@ static inline void adjust_unusable_cap_perc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc);
}
-static inline void adjust_pinned_area_boundary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
-{
- sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
- if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && sbi->first_seq_zone_segno != NULL_SEGNO)
- sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
- GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, sbi->first_seq_zone_segno));
- if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno)
- sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
- MAIN_SECS(sbi) - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno);
-}
-
static void init_once(void *foo)
{
struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = (struct f2fs_inode_info *) foo;
@@ -3078,7 +3067,7 @@ static int __f2fs_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) |
(test_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL) ? SB_POSIXACL : 0);
- adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
+ f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
limit_reserve_root(sbi);
fc->sb_flags = (flags & ~SB_LAZYTIME) | (sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME);
@@ -5321,7 +5310,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
/* get segno of first zoned block device */
sbi->first_seq_zone_segno = get_first_seq_zone_segno(sbi);
- adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
+ f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
sbi->reserved_pin_section = f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ?
ZONED_PIN_SEC_REQUIRED_COUNT :
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize
2026-08-28 14:12 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
@ 2026-08-28 18:08 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-29 6:07 ` Wenjie Qi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2026-08-28 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenjie Qi
Cc: daehojeong, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie, jaegeuk,
sunqiuyang
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 7:19 AM Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> pinned_area_max_secno is derived from MAIN_SECS(), the zoned device
> boundary, and resizable_tail_secno. It is currently recalculated only
> at mount and remount, so online resize leaves the pre-resize value
> active after MAIN_SECS() changes.
>
> A stale value can allow pinned allocations in sections outside the
> new main-area boundary.
>
> Move the calculation to segment.h and call it whenever
> update_fs_metadata() changes MAIN_SECS(). This also restores the
> previous boundary when a final checkpoint error rolls the resize
> metadata back.
>
> Mount option validation compares the tail count with the pre-resize
> section count. Recalculating after a shrink below that tail would make
> the unsigned subtraction wrap. Reject such a shrink with -EINVAL
> before taking resize locks or changing filesystem geometry.
>
> Fixes: c966d29e01bb ("f2fs: support resizable tail section and unify pinned allocation")
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 7 +++++++
> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 15 ++-------------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index 0a00180c21dc..978e85578c79 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -2326,6 +2326,7 @@ static void update_fs_metadata(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int secs)
> SM_I(sbi)->segment_count = (int)SM_I(sbi)->segment_count + segs;
> MAIN_SEGS(sbi) = (int)MAIN_SEGS(sbi) + segs;
> MAIN_SECS(sbi) += secs;
> + f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
> if (sbi->allocate_section_hint > MAIN_SECS(sbi))
> sbi->allocate_section_hint = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
> FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections = (int)FREE_I(sbi)->free_sections + secs;
> @@ -2398,6 +2399,12 @@ int f2fs_resize_fs(struct file *filp, __u64 block_count)
>
> shrunk_blocks = old_block_count - block_count;
> secs = div_u64(shrunk_blocks, BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi));
> + if (secs >= MAIN_SECS(sbi) ||
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno >=
> + MAIN_SECS(sbi) - secs) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_drop_write;
> + }
Hi Wenjie,
The condition can be simplified to avoid unsigned subtraction underflow:
if (MAIN_SECS(sbi) <= secs + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno)
Plus,
1. Could you print out some message here for users to recognize the
failure reason?
2. Can we move this check earlier, before mnt_want_write_file(filp)?
That way we can return -EINVAL immediately on invalid parameters without
the unnecessary mnt_want_write_file() / mnt_drop_write_file() cycle.
>
> /* stop other GC */
> if (!f2fs_down_write_trylock_trace(&sbi->gc_lock, &glc)) {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 5949aa5200ac..7c7ca0730d77 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,22 @@ static inline void sanity_check_seg_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> #define GET_ZONE_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno) \
> GET_ZONE_FROM_SEC(sbi, GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno))
>
> +static inline void f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> + sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
> + if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) &&
> + sbi->first_seq_zone_segno != NULL_SEGNO)
> + sbi->pinned_area_max_secno =
> + min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
> + GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
> + sbi->first_seq_zone_segno));
> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno)
> + sbi->pinned_area_max_secno =
> + min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
> + MAIN_SECS(sbi) -
> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno);
> +}
> +
In f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(), the line breaks around min()
seem a bit excessive. Can we format it more concisely like the original version?
Thanks,
> #define GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno) \
> (SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr + (segno / (sbi)->sums_per_block))
> #define GET_SUM_BLKOFF(sbi, segno) (segno % (sbi)->sums_per_block)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 253a579e9d5b..c8f8ecf49635 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -554,17 +554,6 @@ static inline void adjust_unusable_cap_perc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc);
> }
>
> -static inline void adjust_pinned_area_boundary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> -{
> - sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = MAIN_SECS(sbi);
> - if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && sbi->first_seq_zone_segno != NULL_SEGNO)
> - sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
> - GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, sbi->first_seq_zone_segno));
> - if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno)
> - sbi->pinned_area_max_secno = min(sbi->pinned_area_max_secno,
> - MAIN_SECS(sbi) - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).resizable_tail_secno);
> -}
> -
> static void init_once(void *foo)
> {
> struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = (struct f2fs_inode_info *) foo;
> @@ -3078,7 +3067,7 @@ static int __f2fs_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
> sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) |
> (test_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL) ? SB_POSIXACL : 0);
>
> - adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
> + f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
> limit_reserve_root(sbi);
> fc->sb_flags = (flags & ~SB_LAZYTIME) | (sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME);
>
> @@ -5321,7 +5310,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> /* get segno of first zoned block device */
> sbi->first_seq_zone_segno = get_first_seq_zone_segno(sbi);
>
> - adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
> + f2fs_adjust_pinned_area_boundary(sbi);
>
> sbi->reserved_pin_section = f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ?
> ZONED_PIN_SEC_REQUIRED_COUNT :
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize
2026-08-28 18:08 ` Daeho Jeong
@ 2026-08-29 6:07 ` Wenjie Qi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wenjie Qi @ 2026-08-29 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daeho43
Cc: daehojeong, qwjhust, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie,
jaegeuk, sunqiuyang
Hi Daeho,
I incorporated the review in v2:
- Simplified the incompatible-tail condition.
- Added an error message with the main, shrink, and tail section counts.
- Moved the check before mnt_want_write_file().
- Restored the compact formatting in the shared boundary helper.
- Added a post-freeze recheck for a concurrent remount option change.
The complete v2 series was sent separately.
Thanks,
Wenjie
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize
2026-08-28 14:12 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 14:12 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
@ 2026-09-24 15:57 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-10-19 15:40 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daeho Jeong @ 2026-09-24 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenjie Qi
Cc: daehojeong, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie, jaegeuk,
sunqiuyang
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 7:15 AM Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> During a filesystem resize, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS prevents new SIT entries
> from being added to the journal and forces existing entries to the SIT
> area. However, f2fs_flush_sit_entries() returns early when there are no
> new dirty sentries, leaving existing journal entries behind.
>
> After the main area shrinks, a later checkpoint can access a journal
> entry whose segment number is outside the new geometry and trigger
> f2fs_bug_on().
>
> Only take the zero-dirty fast path when entries may be written back to
> the journal. This lets resize drain existing entries through
> remove_sits_in_journal() even when there are no new dirty sentries.
>
> Fixes: 04f0b2eaa3b3 ("f2fs: ioctl for removing a range from F2FS")
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 1e7e745be71d..9f9ce25dd07e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -4816,7 +4816,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>
> down_write(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
>
> - if (!sit_i->dirty_sentries)
> + if (!sit_i->dirty_sentries && to_journal)
> goto out;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Thanks,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize
2026-08-28 14:12 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 14:12 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
2026-09-24 15:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Daeho Jeong
@ 2026-10-19 15:40 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel @ 2026-10-19 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenjie Qi
Cc: daehojeong, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, qiwenjie, jaegeuk,
sunqiuyang
Hello:
This series was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:12:39 +0800 you wrote:
> During a filesystem resize, SBI_IS_RESIZEFS prevents new SIT entries
> from being added to the journal and forces existing entries to the SIT
> area. However, f2fs_flush_sit_entries() returns early when there are no
> new dirty sentries, leaving existing journal entries behind.
>
> After the main area shrinks, a later checkpoint can access a journal
> entry whose segment number is outside the new geometry and trigger
> f2fs_bug_on().
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev,1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/a6ede4054551
- [f2fs-dev,2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-19 15:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-28 14:12 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 14:12 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
2026-08-28 18:08 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-29 6:07 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-09-24 15:57 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Daeho Jeong
2026-10-19 15:40 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.