All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915/sysfs_clients: Check that client ids are cyclic
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:47:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <183f9081-0aeb-ebad-da8e-0dc25c449d2f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126130505.2938391-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 26/01/2021 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The client id used is a cyclic allocator as that reduces the likelihood
> of userspace seeing the same id used again (and so confusing the new
> client as the old). Verify that each new client has an id greater than
> the last.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c b/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> index a3a1f81e1..d2c1ebc5f 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   #include <errno.h>
>   #include <fcntl.h>
>   #include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
>   #include <math.h>
>   #include <sched.h>
>   #include <sys/socket.h>
> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@
>   #define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
>   	__assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance / 100., tolerance / 100.)
>   
> +#define BUFSZ 280
> +
>   #define MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START (0x31 << 23)
>   #define MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END (0xa << 23)
>   #define MI_ARB_CHECK (0x5 << 23)
> @@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ static void pidname(int i915, int clients)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
>   	int sv[2], rv[2];
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	int me = -1;
>   	long count;
>   	pid_t pid;
> @@ -180,7 +183,7 @@ static long count_clients(int clients)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
>   	long count = 0;
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	DIR *dir;
>   
>   	dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> @@ -229,32 +232,113 @@ static void create(int i915, int clients)
>   	igt_assert_eq(count_clients(clients), 1);
>   }
>   
> +static const char *find_client(int clients, pid_t pid, char *buf)
> +{
> +	DIR *dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> +
> +	/* Reading a dir as it changes does not appear to be stable, SEP */

Oh yes, it is POSIX undefined as far as I could figure out. You are 
creating/destroying clients while reading the dir from different 
threads? I think best might be to introduce explicit sync points between 
those two entities to make this reliable. In another review for the same 
problem I suggested pipes for implementing this handshake. Along the 
lines of "let child open/close some processes, make it wait for parent; 
parent scans sysfs, signals child to open/close some more; repeat for a 
while".

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +	for (int pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
> +		struct dirent *de;
> +
> +		rewinddir(dir);
> +		while ((de = readdir(dir))) {
> +			if (!isdigit(de->d_name[0]))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			snprintf(buf, BUFSZ, "%s/pid", de->d_name);
> +			igt_sysfs_read(clients, buf, buf, sizeof(buf));
> +			if (atoi(buf) != pid)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			strncpy(buf, de->d_name, BUFSZ);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	*buf = '\0';
> +out:
> +	closedir(dir);
> +	return buf;
> +}
> +
>   static int find_me(int clients, pid_t pid)
>   {
> -	struct dirent *de;
> -	char buf[280];
> -	int me = -1;
> -	DIR *dir;
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   
> -	dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> -	igt_assert(dir);
> -	rewinddir(dir);
> +	return openat(clients,
> +		      find_client(clients, pid, buf),
> +		      O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY);
> +}
>   
> -	while ((de = readdir(dir))) {
> -		if (!isdigit(de->d_name[0]))
> -			continue;
> +static int reopen_directory(int fd)
> +{
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
> +	int dir;
>   
> -		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/pid", de->d_name);
> -		igt_sysfs_read(clients, buf, buf, sizeof(buf));
> -		if (atoi(buf) != pid)
> -			continue;
> +	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd);
> +	dir = open(buf, O_RDONLY);
> +	igt_assert_fd(dir);
>   
> -		me = openat(clients, de->d_name, O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY);
> -		break;
> +	return dir;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int my_id(int clients, pid_t pid)
> +{
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
> +
> +	return atoi(find_client(clients, pid, buf));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int recycle_client(int i915, int clients)
> +{
> +	int device, client;
> +
> +	device = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
> +	client = my_id(clients, getpid());
> +	close(device);
> +
> +	return client;
> +}
> +
> +static void recycle(int i915, int clients)
> +{
> +	const int ncpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * As we open and close clients, we do not expect to reuse old ids,
> +	 * i.e. we use a cyclic ida. This reduces the likelihood of userspace
> +	 * watchers becoming confused and mistaking the new client as a
> +	 * continuation of the old.
> +	 */
> +	igt_require(my_id(clients, getpid()) < INT_MAX / 2);
> +	igt_assert(my_id(clients, getpid()));
> +
> +	igt_fork(child, 2 * ncpus) {
> +		unsigned int client, last;
> +
> +		/* Reopen the directory fd for each client */
> +		clients = reopen_directory(clients);
> +
> +		last = recycle_client(i915, clients);
> +		igt_info("Child[%d] first client:%d\n", getpid(), last);
> +		igt_until_timeout(5) {
> +			client = recycle_client(i915, clients);
> +
> +			/* In 5 seconds we are not going to exhaust the ids */
> +			igt_assert(client > last);
> +			last = client;
> +		}
> +		igt_info("Child[%d] last client:%d\n", getpid(), last);
>   	}
> +	igt_waitchildren();
>   
> -	closedir(dir);
> -	return me;
> +	/* Cleanup delayed behind rcu */
> +	igt_until_timeout(30) {
> +		sched_yield();
> +		if (count_clients(clients) == 1)
> +			break;
> +		usleep(10000);
> +	}
> +	igt_assert_eq(count_clients(clients), 1);
>   }
>   
>   static int64_t read_runtime(int client, int class)
> @@ -719,7 +803,7 @@ sema(int i915, int clients, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, int f)
>   static int read_all(int clients, pid_t pid, int class, uint64_t *runtime)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	int count = 0;
>   	DIR *dir;
>   
> @@ -958,6 +1042,9 @@ igt_main
>   	igt_subtest("create")
>   		create(i915, clients);
>   
> +	igt_subtest("recycle")
> +		recycle(i915, clients);
> +
>   	igt_subtest_group
>   		test_busy(i915, clients);
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915/sysfs_clients: Check that client ids are cyclic
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:47:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <183f9081-0aeb-ebad-da8e-0dc25c449d2f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126130505.2938391-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 26/01/2021 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The client id used is a cyclic allocator as that reduces the likelihood
> of userspace seeing the same id used again (and so confusing the new
> client as the old). Verify that each new client has an id greater than
> the last.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c b/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> index a3a1f81e1..d2c1ebc5f 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/sysfs_clients.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   #include <errno.h>
>   #include <fcntl.h>
>   #include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
>   #include <math.h>
>   #include <sched.h>
>   #include <sys/socket.h>
> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@
>   #define assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance) \
>   	__assert_within_epsilon(x, ref, tolerance / 100., tolerance / 100.)
>   
> +#define BUFSZ 280
> +
>   #define MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START (0x31 << 23)
>   #define MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END (0xa << 23)
>   #define MI_ARB_CHECK (0x5 << 23)
> @@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ static void pidname(int i915, int clients)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
>   	int sv[2], rv[2];
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	int me = -1;
>   	long count;
>   	pid_t pid;
> @@ -180,7 +183,7 @@ static long count_clients(int clients)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
>   	long count = 0;
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	DIR *dir;
>   
>   	dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> @@ -229,32 +232,113 @@ static void create(int i915, int clients)
>   	igt_assert_eq(count_clients(clients), 1);
>   }
>   
> +static const char *find_client(int clients, pid_t pid, char *buf)
> +{
> +	DIR *dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> +
> +	/* Reading a dir as it changes does not appear to be stable, SEP */

Oh yes, it is POSIX undefined as far as I could figure out. You are 
creating/destroying clients while reading the dir from different 
threads? I think best might be to introduce explicit sync points between 
those two entities to make this reliable. In another review for the same 
problem I suggested pipes for implementing this handshake. Along the 
lines of "let child open/close some processes, make it wait for parent; 
parent scans sysfs, signals child to open/close some more; repeat for a 
while".

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +	for (int pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
> +		struct dirent *de;
> +
> +		rewinddir(dir);
> +		while ((de = readdir(dir))) {
> +			if (!isdigit(de->d_name[0]))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			snprintf(buf, BUFSZ, "%s/pid", de->d_name);
> +			igt_sysfs_read(clients, buf, buf, sizeof(buf));
> +			if (atoi(buf) != pid)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			strncpy(buf, de->d_name, BUFSZ);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	*buf = '\0';
> +out:
> +	closedir(dir);
> +	return buf;
> +}
> +
>   static int find_me(int clients, pid_t pid)
>   {
> -	struct dirent *de;
> -	char buf[280];
> -	int me = -1;
> -	DIR *dir;
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   
> -	dir = fdopendir(dup(clients));
> -	igt_assert(dir);
> -	rewinddir(dir);
> +	return openat(clients,
> +		      find_client(clients, pid, buf),
> +		      O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY);
> +}
>   
> -	while ((de = readdir(dir))) {
> -		if (!isdigit(de->d_name[0]))
> -			continue;
> +static int reopen_directory(int fd)
> +{
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
> +	int dir;
>   
> -		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/pid", de->d_name);
> -		igt_sysfs_read(clients, buf, buf, sizeof(buf));
> -		if (atoi(buf) != pid)
> -			continue;
> +	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd);
> +	dir = open(buf, O_RDONLY);
> +	igt_assert_fd(dir);
>   
> -		me = openat(clients, de->d_name, O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY);
> -		break;
> +	return dir;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int my_id(int clients, pid_t pid)
> +{
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
> +
> +	return atoi(find_client(clients, pid, buf));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int recycle_client(int i915, int clients)
> +{
> +	int device, client;
> +
> +	device = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
> +	client = my_id(clients, getpid());
> +	close(device);
> +
> +	return client;
> +}
> +
> +static void recycle(int i915, int clients)
> +{
> +	const int ncpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * As we open and close clients, we do not expect to reuse old ids,
> +	 * i.e. we use a cyclic ida. This reduces the likelihood of userspace
> +	 * watchers becoming confused and mistaking the new client as a
> +	 * continuation of the old.
> +	 */
> +	igt_require(my_id(clients, getpid()) < INT_MAX / 2);
> +	igt_assert(my_id(clients, getpid()));
> +
> +	igt_fork(child, 2 * ncpus) {
> +		unsigned int client, last;
> +
> +		/* Reopen the directory fd for each client */
> +		clients = reopen_directory(clients);
> +
> +		last = recycle_client(i915, clients);
> +		igt_info("Child[%d] first client:%d\n", getpid(), last);
> +		igt_until_timeout(5) {
> +			client = recycle_client(i915, clients);
> +
> +			/* In 5 seconds we are not going to exhaust the ids */
> +			igt_assert(client > last);
> +			last = client;
> +		}
> +		igt_info("Child[%d] last client:%d\n", getpid(), last);
>   	}
> +	igt_waitchildren();
>   
> -	closedir(dir);
> -	return me;
> +	/* Cleanup delayed behind rcu */
> +	igt_until_timeout(30) {
> +		sched_yield();
> +		if (count_clients(clients) == 1)
> +			break;
> +		usleep(10000);
> +	}
> +	igt_assert_eq(count_clients(clients), 1);
>   }
>   
>   static int64_t read_runtime(int client, int class)
> @@ -719,7 +803,7 @@ sema(int i915, int clients, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, int f)
>   static int read_all(int clients, pid_t pid, int class, uint64_t *runtime)
>   {
>   	struct dirent *de;
> -	char buf[280];
> +	char buf[BUFSZ];
>   	int count = 0;
>   	DIR *dir;
>   
> @@ -958,6 +1042,9 @@ igt_main
>   	igt_subtest("create")
>   		create(i915, clients);
>   
> +	igt_subtest("recycle")
> +		recycle(i915, clients);
> +
>   	igt_subtest_group
>   		test_busy(i915, clients);
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-26 13:05 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] i915/sysfs_client: Ignore clients being closed as we read their sysfs Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 13:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 13:05 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915/sysfs_clients: Check that client ids are cyclic Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 13:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 16:47   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-01-26 16:47     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-26 22:04     ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 22:07       ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 22:07         ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-27  9:12       ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-27  9:12         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-27  9:51         ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-27  9:51           ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-29  9:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-29  9:52     ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-29  9:52       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-29 18:30       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-26 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] i915/sysfs_client: Ignore clients being closed as we read their sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-26 18:06 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] " Patchwork
2021-01-26 18:18 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-26 23:20 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-26 10:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Chris Wilson
2021-01-26 10:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] i915/sysfs_clients: Check that client ids are cyclic Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=183f9081-0aeb-ebad-da8e-0dc25c449d2f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.