From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@redhat.com>,
"Christian Surchi" <csurchi@debian.org>,
"Rasmus Bøg Hansen"
<rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org>,
492970@bugs.debian.org,
"Linux NFS Mailing List" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux NFSv4 mailing list" <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
Subject: Re: (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released)
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:43:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18581.39391.324920.100038@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from J. Bruce Fields on Saturday August 2
On Saturday August 2, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:15:33PM +1000, An=EDbal Monsalve Salazar w=
rote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:13:19AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > >I just cut the 1.1.3 nfs-utils release. Unfortunately I'm having
> > >issues accessing my kernel.org account so for the moment the=20
> > >tar ball is only available on SourceForge:
> > >
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs
> > >[...]=20
> >=20
> > 1.1.3 clients don't work with a 1.0.10 server anymore.
>=20
> Very weird--it might make sense if upgrading nfs-utils broke the moun=
t
> itself, but here it seems the mount is succeeding and subsequent file
> access (which I'd expect to only involve the in-kernel client code) i=
s
> failing. Maybe there's some difference in the mount options? What d=
oes
> /proc/self/mounts say? I assume these are all v2 or v3 mounts?
I'm guessing v4 and that idmapd is causing problems. I cannot see any
other possible cause (not that this one seems likely).
If we can get a "tcpdump -s0 -port 2049" of the traffic it might help.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-03 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 7:13 nfs-utils-1.1.3 released Steve Dickson
2008-07-29 17:21 ` Steve Dickson
2008-08-01 13:15 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
[not found] ` <20080801131533.GN14057-ePWG1nzy00eujY+JMLXK6WCv5UukjcD9wsqeKsqY1Ps@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-02 17:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20080802172529.GC30454@fieldses.org>
2008-08-03 11:43 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2008-08-03 12:37 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87myjul1fk.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-03 15:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-04 20:55 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87d4ko5wlx.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-05 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-05 19:28 ` Bug#492970: " Rasmus Bøg Hansen
2008-08-06 16:21 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-06 18:21 ` Sergey Bolshakov
2008-08-06 21:24 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Chuck Lever
2008-08-07 15:05 ` Bug#492970: " Lucas Nussbaum
2008-08-07 16:29 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-09 1:06 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-10 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-26 11:10 ` Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18581.39391.324920.100038@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=492970@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=csurchi@debian.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.