From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Paul Collins <paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"Linux NFS Mailing List" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rasmus Bøg Hansen"
<rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org>,
492970@bugs.debian.org, "Christian Surchi" <csurchi@debian.org>,
"Linux NFSv4 mailing list" <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
Subject: Re: (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9692E351-7140-4AD8-99F8-C9271F54CD5F@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d4ko5wlx.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
On Aug 4, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Paul Collins wrote:
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> writes:
>> On Aug 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:37:19AM +1200, Paul Collins wrote:
>>>> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:15:33PM +1000, An=EDbal Monsalve Salaz=
ar
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:13:19AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>>>> I just cut the 1.1.3 nfs-utils release. Unfortunately I'm havin=
g
>>>>>>> issues accessing my kernel.org account so for the moment the
>>>>>>> tar ball is only available on SourceForge:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.1.3 clients don't work with a 1.0.10 server anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very weird--it might make sense if upgrading nfs-utils broke the
>>>>> mount
>>>>> itself, but here it seems the mount is succeeding and subsequent
>>>>> file
>>>>> access (which I'd expect to only involve the in-kernel client
>>>>> code) is
>>>>> failing. Maybe there's some difference in the mount options?
>>>>> What does
>>>>> /proc/self/mounts say? I assume these are all v2 or v3 mounts?
>>>>
>>>> I discovered today that I was no longer able to write to the v3
>>>> mount on
>>>> my 1.1.2 server. I checked /proc/mounts and noticed sec=3Dnull on=
=20
>>>> the
>>>> mount. Either adding sec=3Dsys to the client's mount options or
>>>> downgrading to nfs-common 1.1.2 on the client fixes the problem.
>>>
>>> That would do it!
>>>
>>> So it sounds like there's a bug that causes mount.nfs to get the
>>> default
>>> mount options wrong?
>>
>> I'm not sure I'm following this. I can't think of a user-space
>> mount.nfs change in 1.1.3 that would affect the sec=3D option.
>>
>> Paul, which kernel are you running on your clients?
>
> Either 2.6.26 or 2.6.27-rc1+. I'll double-check.
It would be interesting if you could try both. I suspect 2.6.26 =20
doesn't exhibit this problem, as 27-rc1 has changes in the NFS mount =20
parser that affect "sec=3D".
Also, enabling NFS mount debugging messages when performing the mount =20
that eventually doesn't work would be enlightening (for me). Either:
sudo sysctl -w sunrpc.nfs_debug=3D2048
or if you have the latest rpcdebug installed:
sudo rpcdebug -m nfs -s mount
Then perform the mount. Take a look in /var/log/messages for the =20
debugging messages.
And, please send the full command line of the failing mount request.
> Whichever one it was, the problem was present with 1.1.3 installed, =20
> and
> not present with 1.1.2 installed.
Gotcha.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 7:13 nfs-utils-1.1.3 released Steve Dickson
2008-07-29 17:21 ` Steve Dickson
2008-08-01 13:15 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
[not found] ` <20080801131533.GN14057-ePWG1nzy00eujY+JMLXK6WCv5UukjcD9wsqeKsqY1Ps@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-02 17:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20080802172529.GC30454@fieldses.org>
2008-08-03 11:43 ` Neil Brown
2008-08-03 12:37 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87myjul1fk.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-03 15:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-04 20:55 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87d4ko5wlx.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-05 15:20 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2008-08-05 19:28 ` Bug#492970: " Rasmus Bøg Hansen
2008-08-06 16:21 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-06 18:21 ` Sergey Bolshakov
2008-08-06 21:24 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Chuck Lever
2008-08-07 15:05 ` Bug#492970: " Lucas Nussbaum
2008-08-07 16:29 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-09 1:06 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-10 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-26 11:10 ` Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9692E351-7140-4AD8-99F8-C9271F54CD5F@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=492970@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=csurchi@debian.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=paul-dsjeNyW6Qm/D+ROgJ3VA+kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.