All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
	Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	quentin.schulz@cherry.de, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY schema
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18621846.sWSEgdgrri@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5F5RRFVMP7R.19G82R4S878IL@cknow.org>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2024, 15:17:02 CET schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 12:11 PM CET, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI CSI/DSI PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> >  .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml       | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5ee8d7246fa0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > +      - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  "#phy-cells":
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 2
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: pclk
> > +      - const: ref
> > +
> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 4
> > +
> > +  reset-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: m_phy
> > +      - const: apb
> > +      - const: grf
> > +      - const: s_phy
> > +
> > +  rockchip,grf:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +    description:
> > +      Phandle to the syscon managing the 'mipi dcphy general register files'.
> 
> Should this dt-binding have a power-domains property?
> RK3588 TRM v1.0 part 1 page 1097 has ALIVE(PD_BUS) for
> MIPI_DC_PHY0~MIPI_DC_PHY1

I don't think so. As you write, the dcphy is part of the PD_BUS(ALIVE)
power-domain on at least rk3588 and the new rk3576.

This power-domain is actually non-controllable and also contains things
like the main GIC - so will be always on.

And for that reason probably, that domain also is not even exposed
in the rk3588 devicetree (nor the driver implementation).

Similarly the hdptx phy binding (in a similar situation) also does not
handle a power-domain. So my thinking is, we'll stay like this for now.


Heiko

> FTR: I made a similar remark on another patch sent by Heiko today. While
> that was incorrect, I do think it's appropriate for this binding after
> which it could also be added to the respective phy nodes in the dts(i)
> file(s).
> 
> Cheers,
>   Diederik
> 
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - clocks
> > +  - clock-names
> > +  - resets
> > +  - reset-names
> > +  - "#phy-cells"
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +
> > +    soc {
> > +      #address-cells = <2>;
> > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +      phy@feda0000 {
> > +        compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy";
> > +        reg = <0x0 0xfeda0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > +        clocks = <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru CLK_USBDPPHY_MIPIDCPPHY_REF>;
> > +        clock-names = "pclk", "ref";
> > +        resets = <&cru SRST_M_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0_GRF>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_S_MIPI_DCPHY0>;
> > +        reset-names = "m_phy", "apb", "grf", "s_phy";
> > +        rockchip,grf = <&mipidcphy0_grf>;
> > +        #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +      };
> > +    };
> 
> 






WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
	Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	quentin.schulz@cherry.de, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY schema
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18621846.sWSEgdgrri@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5F5RRFVMP7R.19G82R4S878IL@cknow.org>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2024, 15:17:02 CET schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 12:11 PM CET, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI CSI/DSI PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> >  .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml       | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5ee8d7246fa0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > +      - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  "#phy-cells":
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 2
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: pclk
> > +      - const: ref
> > +
> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 4
> > +
> > +  reset-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: m_phy
> > +      - const: apb
> > +      - const: grf
> > +      - const: s_phy
> > +
> > +  rockchip,grf:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +    description:
> > +      Phandle to the syscon managing the 'mipi dcphy general register files'.
> 
> Should this dt-binding have a power-domains property?
> RK3588 TRM v1.0 part 1 page 1097 has ALIVE(PD_BUS) for
> MIPI_DC_PHY0~MIPI_DC_PHY1

I don't think so. As you write, the dcphy is part of the PD_BUS(ALIVE)
power-domain on at least rk3588 and the new rk3576.

This power-domain is actually non-controllable and also contains things
like the main GIC - so will be always on.

And for that reason probably, that domain also is not even exposed
in the rk3588 devicetree (nor the driver implementation).

Similarly the hdptx phy binding (in a similar situation) also does not
handle a power-domain. So my thinking is, we'll stay like this for now.


Heiko

> FTR: I made a similar remark on another patch sent by Heiko today. While
> that was incorrect, I do think it's appropriate for this binding after
> which it could also be added to the respective phy nodes in the dts(i)
> file(s).
> 
> Cheers,
>   Diederik
> 
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - clocks
> > +  - clock-names
> > +  - resets
> > +  - reset-names
> > +  - "#phy-cells"
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +
> > +    soc {
> > +      #address-cells = <2>;
> > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +      phy@feda0000 {
> > +        compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy";
> > +        reg = <0x0 0xfeda0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > +        clocks = <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru CLK_USBDPPHY_MIPIDCPPHY_REF>;
> > +        clock-names = "pclk", "ref";
> > +        resets = <&cru SRST_M_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0_GRF>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_S_MIPI_DCPHY0>;
> > +        reset-names = "m_phy", "apb", "grf", "s_phy";
> > +        rockchip,grf = <&mipidcphy0_grf>;
> > +        #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +      };
> > +    };
> 
> 





-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
	Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	quentin.schulz@cherry.de, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY schema
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18621846.sWSEgdgrri@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5F5RRFVMP7R.19G82R4S878IL@cknow.org>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 6. November 2024, 15:17:02 CET schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 12:11 PM CET, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI CSI/DSI PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> >  .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml       | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5ee8d7246fa0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > +      - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  "#phy-cells":
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 2
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: pclk
> > +      - const: ref
> > +
> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 4
> > +
> > +  reset-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: m_phy
> > +      - const: apb
> > +      - const: grf
> > +      - const: s_phy
> > +
> > +  rockchip,grf:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +    description:
> > +      Phandle to the syscon managing the 'mipi dcphy general register files'.
> 
> Should this dt-binding have a power-domains property?
> RK3588 TRM v1.0 part 1 page 1097 has ALIVE(PD_BUS) for
> MIPI_DC_PHY0~MIPI_DC_PHY1

I don't think so. As you write, the dcphy is part of the PD_BUS(ALIVE)
power-domain on at least rk3588 and the new rk3576.

This power-domain is actually non-controllable and also contains things
like the main GIC - so will be always on.

And for that reason probably, that domain also is not even exposed
in the rk3588 devicetree (nor the driver implementation).

Similarly the hdptx phy binding (in a similar situation) also does not
handle a power-domain. So my thinking is, we'll stay like this for now.


Heiko

> FTR: I made a similar remark on another patch sent by Heiko today. While
> that was incorrect, I do think it's appropriate for this binding after
> which it could also be added to the respective phy nodes in the dts(i)
> file(s).
> 
> Cheers,
>   Diederik
> 
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - clocks
> > +  - clock-names
> > +  - resets
> > +  - reset-names
> > +  - "#phy-cells"
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> > +
> > +    soc {
> > +      #address-cells = <2>;
> > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +      phy@feda0000 {
> > +        compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy";
> > +        reg = <0x0 0xfeda0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > +        clocks = <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru CLK_USBDPPHY_MIPIDCPPHY_REF>;
> > +        clock-names = "pclk", "ref";
> > +        resets = <&cru SRST_M_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0_GRF>,
> > +                 <&cru SRST_S_MIPI_DCPHY0>;
> > +        reset-names = "m_phy", "apb", "grf", "s_phy";
> > +        rockchip,grf = <&mipidcphy0_grf>;
> > +        #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +      };
> > +    };
> 
> 





_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04 11:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] MIPI DSI phy for rk3588 Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY schema Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11   ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11   ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-05  8:59   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-05  8:59     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-05  8:59     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-11-06 14:17   ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-06 14:17     ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-06 14:17     ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-13 18:50     ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-11-13 18:50       ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-13 18:50       ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-04 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: rockchip: Add Samsung CSI/DSI Combo DCPHY driver Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11   ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-04 11:11   ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-05 14:53   ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-05 14:53     ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-05 14:53     ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-13 12:39     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-13 12:39       ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-13 12:39       ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-05 19:14   ` kernel test robot
2024-11-05 19:14     ` kernel test robot
2024-11-05 19:14     ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18621846.sWSEgdgrri@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=didi.debian@cknow.org \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.