Re: [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 22066: regressions - FAIL

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>]

Thursday, November 21, 2013, 6:44:35 PM, you wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 5:37:57 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > flight 22066 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
>> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/
>> 
>> > Regressions :-(
>> 
>> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> > including tests which could not be run:
>> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install    fail REGR. vs. 20054
>> 
>> Wasn't this supposed to be fixed by Anthony Perards fix for Xen ?

> Yes, but that needs to pass regression testing on the xen-unstable
> branch before the qemu branch will be tested against it. xen-unstable is
> currently not going through for unrelated reasons but I expect it will
> unwedge tonight.

> Ian.



Hi Ian / Stefano,

Is the tree and branch being tested here published somewhere ?
A commit of mine is in there, but i can't find it where i would expected in:

git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git

(and also not in: git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
nor git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git)


But it is mentioned in the "People who touched revisions under test" ...

--
Sander