* [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
@ 2005-04-10 16:14 Radu CUGUT
2005-04-10 17:14 ` Peter Surda
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Radu CUGUT @ 2005-04-10 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello there,
Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating
qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple
bandwidth limmiting, and it works.
I've read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but
couldn't make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for
ingress policing ...
Thanks in advance.
Have a nice day.
--
Radu Cugut
mobile: +40 742 045686
web: http://rcugut.has.it
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
2005-04-10 16:14 [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ? Radu CUGUT
@ 2005-04-10 17:14 ` Peter Surda
2005-04-11 21:20 ` Chris Bennett
2005-04-20 11:16 ` Radu CUGUT
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Surda @ 2005-04-10 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:14:22PM +0300, Radu CUGUT wrote:
> Hello there,
hi
> Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
- if you want to shape incoming traffic
- if you want to bundle devices
> I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on
> LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple bandwidth
> limmiting, and it works.
It doesn't manage traffic caused by the router itself. If you can avoid this
though, you're right, just make sure you filter router's traffic on the LAN
side too.
Even a router without much functionality often provides DNS proxy, ssh or
http(s) access, which is already its own traffic and IMQ helps in that case.
> I've read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but couldn't make
> myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for ingress policing ...
Because shaping is more than policing ;-)
> Radu Cugut
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <shurdeek@routehat.org>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
"Where do you want to go to die?"
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
2005-04-10 16:14 [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ? Radu CUGUT
2005-04-10 17:14 ` Peter Surda
@ 2005-04-11 21:20 ` Chris Bennett
2005-04-20 11:16 ` Radu CUGUT
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Bennett @ 2005-04-11 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
In the case where you have a router (that is not generating signficant
traffic itself) with one internet facing interface and one LAN facing
interface, you really don't need IMQ.
It becomes very useful in alternate cases where, for example, you have
multiple interfaces facing the internet (eg, two DSL connections). In this
case the data coming into one of the internet facing interfaces no longer
equals the amount of data exiting the LAN facing interface, so trying to
control the internet ingress by policing the LAN egress is no longer a
simple matter.
But yea, in the simple firewall/shaping router case, IMQ is generally not
worth the time. Add multiple interfaces coming in our out, or add VPN to
the ruoter, and it becomes a more complicated situation.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radu CUGUT" <rcugut@gmail.com>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
> Hello there,
>
> Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ?
>
> I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating
> qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple
> bandwidth limmiting, and it works.
>
> I've read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but
> couldn't make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for
> ingress policing ...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Radu Cugut
>
> mobile: +40 742 045686
> web: http://rcugut.has.it
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ?
2005-04-10 16:14 [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ? Radu CUGUT
2005-04-10 17:14 ` Peter Surda
2005-04-11 21:20 ` Chris Bennett
@ 2005-04-20 11:16 ` Radu CUGUT
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Radu CUGUT @ 2005-04-20 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
OK, i've got the ideea.
In conclusion if i have a simple:
LAN --- router --- WAN
i don't need IMQ stuff :)
thanks
bye
--
Radu Cugut
mobile: +40 742 045686
web: http://rcugut.has.it
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-20 11:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-10 16:14 [LARTC] IMQ: why do I need IMQ ? Radu CUGUT
2005-04-10 17:14 ` Peter Surda
2005-04-11 21:20 ` Chris Bennett
2005-04-20 11:16 ` Radu CUGUT
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.