From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disk speed comparison
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:49:09 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19033157.9.1356198549636.JavaMail.root@zimbra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMCDed=47sKjPBkP-MW=ZZoEuk6KXn6fQJj5hVdxpEdueLrHw@mail.gmail.com>
> > I have an array with 6 2TB drives plus a spare. While this works
> > well, I can from the munin graphs at
> > http://munin.karlsbakk.net/munin/karlsbakk.net/smilla.karlsbakk.net/index.html
> > that the WD2001FASS drives (sd[bcfg]) perform some 30% better than
> > the Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 drives (sd[eh]). The drives are on a
> > mixed set of controllers, so this shouldn't be relevant. Since they
> > all are specified to spin on 7200RPM, I find it wierd that the
> > performance difference shown by the Munin graph is so big.
> >
> > Anyone seen something similar?
>
> Go the the manufacturers web sites and find the spec sheets for the
> drivers.
>
> They will likely list a min speed and a max speed for how fast data is
> passing under the head depending on if it is the inner or outer track.
>
> It basically comes down to if all is working exactly right, the number
> of bytes passing under the head times rpm, so if one disk has a higher
> bit density the rate will be larger, and this varies quite a bit from
> disk to disk.
Thanks for the replay
WD2001FASS: 4x500GB platters
HDS723020BLA642: 3x667GB platters
- Shouldn't higher density normally mean higher speed?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-22 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-22 17:39 Disk speed comparison Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:44 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 17:49 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2012-12-22 17:53 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 18:07 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 0:11 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-23 4:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-12-23 5:29 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 22:04 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19033157.9.1356198549636.JavaMail.root@zimbra \
--to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.