From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disk speed comparison
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:59:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D68FC0.70807@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27374116.4.1356197991689.JavaMail.root@zimbra>
On 12/22/2012 11:39 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> I have an array with 6 2TB drives plus a spare. While this works well, I can from the munin graphs at http://munin.karlsbakk.net/munin/karlsbakk.net/smilla.karlsbakk.net/index.html that the WD2001FASS drives (sd[bcfg]) perform some 30% better than the Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 drives (sd[eh]). The drives are on a mixed set of controllers, so this shouldn't be relevant. Since they all are specified to spin on 7200RPM, I find it wierd that the performance difference shown by the Munin graph is so big.
You've provided zero information about the controllers or the
configuration of the drives. If the SATA ASIC to which the Black drives
are connected is AHCI and the other is not, then NCQ may account for the
difference in performance. Or, both may currently be AHCI, but possibly
the Hitachi drives perform better with NCQ disabled. This would not be
rare. If you laid partitions on the Hitachi drives and misaligned them,
this could easily cause a 30% deficit. Etc, etc.
I doubt there is a 30% overall performance difference between these two
drive models. The Black models are "enthusiast" class drives, and do
have some additional performance features, but not that I'd think would
yield a 30% advantage.
You need to dig deeper into the details.
--
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-23 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-22 17:39 Disk speed comparison Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:44 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 17:49 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:53 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 18:07 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 0:11 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-23 4:59 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2012-12-23 5:29 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 22:04 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D68FC0.70807@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.