All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:51:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19099161.fAMKPKieAE@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618-rk3588-hdmiphy-clkprov-v1-2-80e4aa12177e@collabora.com>

Am Montag, 17. Juni 2024, 23:48:10 CEST schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> When a new PHY is created via [devm_]phy_create(), the runtime PM for it
> is not enabled unless the parent device (which creates the PHY) has its
> own runtime PM already enabled.
> 
> Move the call to devm_pm_runtime_enable() before devm_phy_create() to
> enable runtime PM at PHY core level.
> 
> With this change the ->power_on() and ->power_off() callbacks do not
> require explicit runtime PM management anymore, since the PHY core
> handles that via phy_pm_runtime_{get,put}_sync() when phy_power_on() and
> phy_power_off() are invoked.
> 
> Hence drop the now unnecessary calls to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and
> pm_runtime_put() helpers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>

checked against phy_create()

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>



-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:51:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19099161.fAMKPKieAE@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618-rk3588-hdmiphy-clkprov-v1-2-80e4aa12177e@collabora.com>

Am Montag, 17. Juni 2024, 23:48:10 CEST schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> When a new PHY is created via [devm_]phy_create(), the runtime PM for it
> is not enabled unless the parent device (which creates the PHY) has its
> own runtime PM already enabled.
> 
> Move the call to devm_pm_runtime_enable() before devm_phy_create() to
> enable runtime PM at PHY core level.
> 
> With this change the ->power_on() and ->power_off() callbacks do not
> require explicit runtime PM management anymore, since the PHY core
> handles that via phy_pm_runtime_{get,put}_sync() when phy_power_on() and
> phy_power_off() are invoked.
> 
> Hence drop the now unnecessary calls to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and
> pm_runtime_put() helpers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>

checked against phy_create()

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Algea Cao <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:51:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19099161.fAMKPKieAE@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618-rk3588-hdmiphy-clkprov-v1-2-80e4aa12177e@collabora.com>

Am Montag, 17. Juni 2024, 23:48:10 CEST schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> When a new PHY is created via [devm_]phy_create(), the runtime PM for it
> is not enabled unless the parent device (which creates the PHY) has its
> own runtime PM already enabled.
> 
> Move the call to devm_pm_runtime_enable() before devm_phy_create() to
> enable runtime PM at PHY core level.
> 
> With this change the ->power_on() and ->power_off() callbacks do not
> require explicit runtime PM management anymore, since the PHY core
> handles that via phy_pm_runtime_{get,put}_sync() when phy_power_on() and
> phy_power_off() are invoked.
> 
> Hence drop the now unnecessary calls to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and
> pm_runtime_put() helpers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>

checked against phy_create()

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>




  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-18  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-17 21:48 [PATCH 0/4] Add clock provider support to Rockchip RK3588 HDMI TX PHY Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Explicitly include pm_runtime.h Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18  7:47   ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18  7:47     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18  7:47     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18  7:51   ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-06-18  7:51     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18  7:51     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-hdptx-phy: Add #clock-cells Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18  6:42   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-18  6:42     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-18  6:42     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Add clock provider support Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-17 21:48   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18  7:55   ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18  7:55     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18  7:55     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-18 11:25     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18 11:25       ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-06-18 11:25       ` Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19099161.fAMKPKieAE@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=algea.cao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.