Re: [PATCH 0/6] 9pfs: fix fstat() after unlink() (with a Linux guest)

[Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>]

On Monday, November 25, 2024 9:45:54 AM CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:28:40 +0100
> Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> 
> > This fixes an infamous, long standing bug:
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/103
> > 
> 
> \o/
> 
> It is great if you manage to fix that once and far all !
> 
> > * Actual fix of this bug is patch 5.
> > 
> > * Patches 1 and 6 add a test case to verify the expected behaviour.
> > 
> > * The other patches (2, 3, 4) are basically just minor cleanup patches more
> >   or less (un)related that I simply did not bother to send separately.
> > 
> > Probably there are still other 9p request types that should be fixed for this
> > use-after-unlink idiom, but this series fixes the mentioned bug report as
> > described by reporter, so fair enough to round this up here for now.
> > 
> 
> When I last worked on that issue I had spotted some other places to fix.
> 
> Maybe you can find some ideas for future work at :
> 
> https://github.com/gkurz/qemu/tree/9p-attr-fixes

Was there a reason why you left those patches on the attic?

What I am seeing is that it was not fixing Tgetattr (i.e. fstat() on guest),
so it wouldn't have fixed the original reporter's scenario, but they would
have brought things forward. So just wondering ...

/Christian