* [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three)
@ 2013-12-18 22:04 Paul Moore
2013-12-23 21:19 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2013-12-18 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-security-module, selinux
Hi James,
Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and both
should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent 3.13-rcX
fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus did himself
before it could flow from the SELinux tree.
Enjoy,
-Paul
---
The following changes are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux_fixes master
for you to fetch changes up to 67439a11ae99e19cfdc3a8f6d7fde24e07e34acb:
selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
(2013-12-16 16:16:08 -0500)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chad Hanson (1):
selinux: fix broken peer recv check
Oleg Nesterov (1):
selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
security/selinux/hooks.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three)
2013-12-18 22:04 [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three) Paul Moore
@ 2013-12-23 21:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-12-23 22:34 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2013-12-23 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-security-module, selinux
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 05:04:26 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and
> both should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent
> 3.13-rcX fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus did
> himself before it could flow from the SELinux tree.
>
> Enjoy,
> -Paul
These two patches really should go into the 3.13 release, the patch from Chad
is particularly important. Any hope of pushing this to Linus soon?
> ---
> The following changes are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux_fixes master
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 67439a11ae99e19cfdc3a8f6d7fde24e07e34acb:
>
> selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
> (2013-12-16 16:16:08 -0500)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Chad Hanson (1):
> selinux: fix broken peer recv check
>
> Oleg Nesterov (1):
> selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three)
2013-12-23 21:19 ` Paul Moore
@ 2013-12-23 22:34 ` James Morris
2013-12-23 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2013-12-24 4:03 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2013-12-23 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: linux-security-module, selinux
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 05:04:26 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and
> > both should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent
> > 3.13-rcX fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus did
> > himself before it could flow from the SELinux tree.
> >
Can you make a new branch for me to pull from, based on current Linus?
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three)
2013-12-23 22:34 ` James Morris
@ 2013-12-23 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2013-12-24 4:03 ` Eric Paris
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2013-12-23 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-security-module, selinux
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 09:34:14 AM James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 05:04:26 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and
> > > both should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent
> > > 3.13-rcX fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus
> > > did himself before it could flow from the SELinux tree.
>
> Can you make a new branch for me to pull from, based on current Linus?
Here ya go ...
---
The following changes since commit f5835372ebedf26847c2b9e193284075cc9c1f7f:
Merge branch 'drm-fixes' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux
(2013-12-23 11:49:16 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux_fixes for_james
for you to fetch changes up to c0c1439541f5305b57a83d599af32b74182933fe:
selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
(2013-12-23 17:45:17 -0500)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chad Hanson (1):
selinux: fix broken peer recv check
Oleg Nesterov (1):
selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()
security/selinux/hooks.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three)
2013-12-23 22:34 ` James Morris
2013-12-23 22:51 ` Paul Moore
@ 2013-12-24 4:03 ` Eric Paris
2013-12-24 6:48 ` James Morris
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2013-12-24 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: LSM List, SE-Linux
Why? The SELinux tree should not be rebasing patches or merging
random snapshots in Linus' tree...
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:34 PM, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Paul Moore wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 05:04:26 PM Paul Moore wrote:
>> > Hi James,
>> >
>> > Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and
>> > both should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent
>> > 3.13-rcX fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus did
>> > himself before it could flow from the SELinux tree.
>> >
>
> Can you make a new branch for me to pull from, based on current Linus?
>
>
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@namei.org>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-24 6:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-18 22:04 [GIT PULL] SELinux fixes for 3.13 (part three) Paul Moore
2013-12-23 21:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-12-23 22:34 ` James Morris
2013-12-23 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2013-12-24 4:03 ` Eric Paris
2013-12-24 6:48 ` James Morris
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.