* unreserved_port_t
@ 2021-03-03 10:26 Russell Coker
2021-03-04 14:18 ` unreserved_port_t Dominick Grift
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2021-03-03 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: selinux-refpolicy
How are we supposed to write policy for programs that bind to random unused
ports >1024? There doesn't seem to be any macro that allows binging to
unreserved_port_t except corenet_tcp_bind_all_unreserved_ports() which is too
permissive.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-03 10:26 unreserved_port_t Russell Coker
2021-03-04 14:18 ` unreserved_port_t Dominick Grift
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.