All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* unreserved_port_t
@ 2021-03-03 10:26 Russell Coker
  2021-03-04 14:18 ` unreserved_port_t Dominick Grift
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2021-03-03 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: selinux-refpolicy

How are we supposed to write policy for programs that bind to random unused 
ports >1024?  There doesn't seem to be any macro that allows binging to 
unreserved_port_t except corenet_tcp_bind_all_unreserved_ports() which is too 
permissive.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04 14:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-03 10:26 unreserved_port_t Russell Coker
2021-03-04 14:18 ` unreserved_port_t Dominick Grift

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.