All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] [TRY #2] GFS2: Drop inadequate rgrps from the reservation tree
       [not found] <113290048.17688056.1383753391651.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
@ 2013-11-06 15:58 ` Bob Peterson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2013-11-06 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cluster-devel.redhat.com

Hi,

This is just basically a resend of a patch I posted earlier.
It didn't change from its original, except in diff offsets, etc:

This patch fixes a bug in the GFS2 block allocation code. The problem
starts if a process already has a multi-block reservation, but for
some reason, another process disqualifies it from further allocations.
For example, the other process might set on the GFS2_RDF_ERROR bit.
The process holding the reservation jumps to label skip_rgrp, but
that label comes after the code that removes the reservation from the
tree. Therefore, the no longer usable reservation is not removed from
the rgrp's reservations tree; it's lost. Eventually, the lost reservation
causes the count of reserved blocks to get off, and eventually that
causes a BUG_ON(rs->rs_rbm.rgd->rd_reserved < rs->rs_free) to trigger.
This patch moves the call to after label skip_rgrp so that the
disqualified reservation is properly removed from the tree, thus keeping
the rgrp rd_reserved count sane.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> 
---
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 0fb2299..ba5eb41 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1944,15 +1944,16 @@ int gfs2_inplace_reserve(struct gfs2_inode *ip, const struct gfs2_alloc_parms *a
 			return 0;
 		}
 
-		/* Drop reservation, if we couldn't use reserved rgrp */
-		if (gfs2_rs_active(rs))
-			gfs2_rs_deltree(rs);
 check_rgrp:
 		/* Check for unlinked inodes which can be reclaimed */
 		if (rs->rs_rbm.rgd->rd_flags & GFS2_RDF_CHECK)
 			try_rgrp_unlink(rs->rs_rbm.rgd, &last_unlinked,
 					ip->i_no_addr);
 skip_rgrp:
+		/* Drop reservation, if we couldn't use reserved rgrp */
+		if (gfs2_rs_active(rs))
+			gfs2_rs_deltree(rs);
+
 		/* Unlock rgrp if required */
 		if (!rg_locked)
 			gfs2_glock_dq_uninit(&rs->rs_rgd_gh);



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 15:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <113290048.17688056.1383753391651.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-11-06 15:58 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH] [TRY #2] GFS2: Drop inadequate rgrps from the reservation tree Bob Peterson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.