From: Spam <spam@tnonline.net>
To: neuron <linux-lvm@sistina.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM across network
Date: Wed Nov 26 12:11:01 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199870551.20031126190959@tnonline.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031126165649.1fd1c51b.neuron@hollowtube.mine.nu>
As far as I can tell NBD 2.x is stable. You can setup failovers with
NBD if you have more than one NIC in the computers. I have not
tested this myself.
The risk is that you accidentally disconnect a network cable etc.
Otherwise it is up to the stability of each machine to make this
work in the long run. For temp space this is fine =).
I doubt any network filesystem will allow you to disconnect a
machine and still be able to operate. NFS etc support a reastart of
the machine, but you cannot consolidate the distributed diskspace
into one logical volume.
Give NBD a try and test what happens if you disconnect a computer
then reconnect it.
I am using NBD 2.0 in Gentoo Linux together with LVM and ReiserFS
without any problems (so far).
> quick question about this, been looking for a good solution for
> this a long time. Any filesystems that can loose connectivity? I
> have a setup where I can't guarantee all the computers will stay
> stable, but it's only a setup for temporary storage anyway (1gb
> networks, temporary storage is for rendering files).
>>
>> Yes. This is possible with NBD 2.0 and later (earlier nbd tools has
>> limitation of 4GB per shared disk/volume/device). You need to
>> compile the NBD (Network Block Device) module in the kernel too.
>>
>> Then simply run on the server (the machines hosting spare volumes):
>>
>> nbd-server 10000 /dev/hdax (replace 10009 with the port you want
>> to use)
>>
>> On the client machine (where you want to run LVM to collect all
>> space;
>>
>> nbd-client IP port /dev/nbd/0
>>
>> For each server you connect simply change the IP/port and the NBD
>> device number. After this you run "vgscan" and "vgchange -ay vg"
>>
>> You should be warned though. If you loose network connectivity you
>> can end up with filesystem damage.
>>
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I have simple question. Is it possible run LVM across network ?
>> > For example, first disk on pc1, second on pc3, third on pc3...
>> > I need file system that colecting free space across network onto one
>> > point.
>> > Thank you, Marek Jan
>>
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > linux-lvm mailing list
>> > linux-lvm@sistina.com
>> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-26 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-26 8:58 [linux-lvm] LVM across network Marek Jan
2003-11-26 9:41 ` Spam
2003-11-26 9:59 ` neuron
2003-11-26 12:11 ` Spam [this message]
2003-11-27 1:58 ` Rickard Olsson
2003-11-27 9:53 ` Dan Sully
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199870551.20031126190959@tnonline.net \
--to=spam@tnonline.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.