From: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@bun.falkenberg.se>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Isaacson <adisaacs@mtu.edu>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Resources in X11 port
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 21:23:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990413212313.A26025@bun.falkenberg.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m10X8aD-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu>; from Alan Cox on Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 08:10:52PM +0100
On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 08:10:52PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > If you (the porters) are willing to wait until June to have publicly
> > distributable code, you should develop for the 4.0 branch rather than
> > the 3.3 branch. There are a lot of useful new features in the new
> > code base, and the new design is quite a bit easier to code for than
> > the old.
>
> Actually I wonder if it will be.
I got an email from the X team today which told me that pulic release date for
a beta snapshot of 4.0 still is set to June.
> Not having seen the code because of the silly XFree about beta releases its
> hard to be sure. The X folks I talked to all pointed me at the 8514 driver -
> which is very similar in many ways to the SGI cards - both are designed for
> X11, both have no direct frame buffer access and they have fairly similar
> concepts.
That 8514 driver is certainly a good driver to look at while writing a driver
for the SGI cards, but it's generally a bad idea to just rip the code off. I
have at least not had much luck doing success hacks.
The 8514 driver is also a quite old driver and it's not using the new interfaces
in for Xserver.
> I would urge btw that anyone working on an XFree SGI driver releases it under
> a license like the NPL so that the XFree people can't hide it in a locked away
> beta release in future.
The copyright still remains to the person who wrote the code, and even if the
code is locked away in a beta release, it's possible for the writer himself to
make his own code public (i think).
- Ulf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-13 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-13 8:57 First Linux/SGI in India Raj Mathur
1999-04-13 10:23 ` Ulf Carlsson
1999-04-13 16:33 ` Resources in X11 port Theodoros Nikitopoulos
1999-04-13 16:52 ` Andrew Isaacson
1999-04-13 17:22 ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-13 19:10 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-13 19:10 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-13 13:45 ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-13 21:18 ` Andrew Isaacson
1999-04-13 17:20 ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-14 0:17 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14 0:17 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14 9:39 ` Torbjorn Gannholm
1999-04-14 10:35 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14 10:35 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-15 4:36 ` Raj Mathur
1999-04-15 4:36 ` Raj Mathur
1999-04-15 12:58 ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-16 0:20 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-16 0:20 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-15 18:38 ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-15 18:38 ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-13 19:23 ` Ulf Carlsson [this message]
1999-04-13 17:21 ` Ulf Carlsson
1999-04-13 20:20 ` Resources in X11 port #2 Theodoros Nikitopoulos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19990413212313.A26025@bun.falkenberg.se \
--to=ulfc@bun.falkenberg.se \
--cc=adisaacs@mtu.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.