All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
To: adisaacs@mtu.edu (Andrew Isaacson)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Resources in X11 port
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:10:52 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m10X8aD-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990413125254.A20170@mtu.edu> from "Andrew Isaacson" at Apr 13, 99 12:52:54 pm

> If you (the porters) are willing to wait until June to have publicly
> distributable code, you should develop for the 4.0 branch rather than
> the 3.3 branch.  There are a lot of useful new features in the new
> code base, and the new design is quite a bit easier to code for than
> the old.

Actually I wonder if it will be. Not having seen the code because of the silly
XFree about beta releases its hard to be sure. The X folks I talked to all
pointed me at the 8514 driver - which is very similar in many ways to the
SGI cards - both are designed for X11, both have no direct frame buffer
access and they have fairly similar concepts.

I would urge btw that anyone working on an XFree SGI driver releases it under
a license like the NPL so that the XFree people can't hide it in a locked away
beta release in future.

Alan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
To: Andrew Isaacson <adisaacs@mtu.edu>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Resources in X11 port
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:10:52 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m10X8aD-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990413191052.s7vz8OIxyCbG5wdSK735sfMDmz4zZk73R18-ZQuS0C4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990413125254.A20170@mtu.edu> from "Andrew Isaacson" at Apr 13, 99 12:52:54 pm

> If you (the porters) are willing to wait until June to have publicly
> distributable code, you should develop for the 4.0 branch rather than
> the 3.3 branch.  There are a lot of useful new features in the new
> code base, and the new design is quite a bit easier to code for than
> the old.

Actually I wonder if it will be. Not having seen the code because of the silly
XFree about beta releases its hard to be sure. The X folks I talked to all
pointed me at the 8514 driver - which is very similar in many ways to the
SGI cards - both are designed for X11, both have no direct frame buffer
access and they have fairly similar concepts.

I would urge btw that anyone working on an XFree SGI driver releases it under
a license like the NPL so that the XFree people can't hide it in a locked away
beta release in future.

Alan

  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-04-13 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-04-13  8:57 First Linux/SGI in India Raj Mathur
1999-04-13 10:23 ` Ulf Carlsson
1999-04-13 16:33   ` Resources in X11 port Theodoros Nikitopoulos
1999-04-13 16:52     ` Andrew Isaacson
1999-04-13 17:22       ` Mike Shaver
1999-04-13 19:10       ` Alan Cox [this message]
1999-04-13 19:10         ` Alan Cox
1999-04-13 13:45         ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-13 21:18           ` Andrew Isaacson
1999-04-13 17:20             ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-14  0:17               ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14  0:17                 ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14  9:39                 ` Torbjorn Gannholm
1999-04-14 10:35                   ` Alan Cox
1999-04-14 10:35                     ` Alan Cox
1999-04-15  4:36                     ` Raj Mathur
1999-04-15  4:36                       ` Raj Mathur
1999-04-15 12:58                       ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-16  0:20                         ` Alan Cox
1999-04-16  0:20                           ` Alan Cox
1999-04-15 18:38                           ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-15 18:38                             ` Miguel de Icaza
1999-04-13 19:23         ` Ulf Carlsson
1999-04-13 17:21     ` Ulf Carlsson
1999-04-13 20:20       ` Resources in X11 port #2 Theodoros Nikitopoulos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m10X8aD-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=adisaacs@mtu.edu \
    --cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.