All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	willy@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, david@fromorbit.com,
	djwong@kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org
Cc: john.g.garry@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:18:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b211dd3-a45d-4a2e-aa2a-e0d3e302d4ca@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204231209.429356-2-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On 2/5/25 00:12, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> When we read over all buffers in a folio we currently use the
> buffer index on the folio and blocksize to get the offset. Simplify
> this with bh_offset(). This simplifies the loop while making no
> functional changes.
> 
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> ---
>   fs/buffer.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index cc8452f60251..b99560e8a142 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -2381,7 +2381,6 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
>   	lblock = div_u64(limit + blocksize - 1, blocksize);
>   	bh = head;
>   	nr = 0;
> -	i = 0;
>   
>   	do {
>   		if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
> @@ -2398,7 +2397,7 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
>   					page_error = true;
>   			}
>   			if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
> -				folio_zero_range(folio, i * blocksize,
> +				folio_zero_range(folio, bh_offset(bh),
>   						blocksize);
>   				if (!err)
>   					set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> @@ -2412,7 +2411,7 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
>   				continue;
>   		}
>   		arr[nr++] = bh;
> -	} while (i++, iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
> +	} while (iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
>   
>   	if (fully_mapped)
>   		folio_set_mappedtodisk(folio);

One wonders: shouldn't we use plugging here to make I/O more efficient?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-05 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 23:12 [PATCH v2 0/8] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset() Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:18   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-02-05 22:03     ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-06  7:17       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-06 17:30         ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-07  7:06           ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] fs/buffer: remove batching from async read Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-07  7:08     ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-17 21:40   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:58   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-18 15:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-21 18:58       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-21 20:25         ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-21 20:38           ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-21 20:27         ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-21 20:39           ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] fs/buffer fs/mpage: remove large folio restriction Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-17 21:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] block/bdev: lift block size restrictions to 64k Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 22:01   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] bdev: use bdev_io_min() for statx block size Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:22   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b211dd3-a45d-4a2e-aa2a-e0d3e302d4ca@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.