From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: hare@suse.de, willy@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, kbusch@kernel.org
Cc: john.g.garry@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset()
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:12:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204231209.429356-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204231209.429356-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
When we read over all buffers in a folio we currently use the
buffer index on the folio and blocksize to get the offset. Simplify
this with bh_offset(). This simplifies the loop while making no
functional changes.
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
fs/buffer.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index cc8452f60251..b99560e8a142 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2381,7 +2381,6 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
lblock = div_u64(limit + blocksize - 1, blocksize);
bh = head;
nr = 0;
- i = 0;
do {
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
@@ -2398,7 +2397,7 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
page_error = true;
}
if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
- folio_zero_range(folio, i * blocksize,
+ folio_zero_range(folio, bh_offset(bh),
blocksize);
if (!err)
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
@@ -2412,7 +2411,7 @@ int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
continue;
}
arr[nr++] = bh;
- } while (i++, iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
+ } while (iblock++, (bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
if (fully_mapped)
folio_set_mappedtodisk(folio);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 23:12 [PATCH v2 0/8] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-04 23:12 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2025-02-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset() Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-05 22:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-06 7:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-06 17:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-07 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] fs/buffer: remove batching from async read Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-07 7:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-17 21:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-18 15:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-21 18:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-21 20:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-21 20:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-21 20:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-21 20:39 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] fs/buffer fs/mpage: remove large folio restriction Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-17 21:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 21:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] block/bdev: lift block size restrictions to 64k Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-17 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-04 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] bdev: use bdev_io_min() for statx block size Luis Chamberlain
2025-02-05 16:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250204231209.429356-2-mcgrof@kernel.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.