From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: porter: Add missing PMIC nodes
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:05:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d93db7c-e65a-e2b3-5a65-a1eb4fa1d60e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180223164517.aboazzeuujgtkh7q@verge.net.au>
On 02/23/2018 05:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> CC Steve Twiss
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Add PMIC nodes to Porter and connect CPU DVFS supply. There is
>>> one DA9063 and one DA9210 on Porter, the only difference from
>>> the other boards is that DA9063 is at I2C address 0x5a rather
>>> than 0x58 .
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> @@ -354,10 +354,47 @@
>>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&i2c6 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
>>> +
>>> + pmic@5a {
>>> + compatible = "dlg,da9063";
>>
>> Does it matter that this is a DA9063L ("Variant 6B")?
>> Do we need a new compatible value, or can this be detected at runtime?
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> could you follow up on this?
Yes, ASAP, once I'm back in the office, currently I'm stuck at the airport.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: porter: Add missing PMIC nodes
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:05:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d93db7c-e65a-e2b3-5a65-a1eb4fa1d60e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180223164517.aboazzeuujgtkh7q@verge.net.au>
On 02/23/2018 05:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> CC Steve Twiss
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Add PMIC nodes to Porter and connect CPU DVFS supply. There is
>>> one DA9063 and one DA9210 on Porter, the only difference from
>>> the other boards is that DA9063 is at I2C address 0x5a rather
>>> than 0x58 .
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> @@ -354,10 +354,47 @@
>>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&i2c6 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
>>> +
>>> + pmic at 5a {
>>> + compatible = "dlg,da9063";
>>
>> Does it matter that this is a DA9063L ("Variant 6B")?
>> Do we need a new compatible value, or can this be detected at runtime?
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> could you follow up on this?
Yes, ASAP, once I'm back in the office, currently I'm stuck at the airport.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: porter: Add missing PMIC nodes
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:05:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d93db7c-e65a-e2b3-5a65-a1eb4fa1d60e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180223164517.aboazzeuujgtkh7q@verge.net.au>
On 02/23/2018 05:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> CC Steve Twiss
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Add PMIC nodes to Porter and connect CPU DVFS supply. There is
>>> one DA9063 and one DA9210 on Porter, the only difference from
>>> the other boards is that DA9063 is at I2C address 0x5a rather
>>> than 0x58 .
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791-porter.dts
>>> @@ -354,10 +354,47 @@
>>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&i2c6 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
>>> +
>>> + pmic@5a {
>>> + compatible = "dlg,da9063";
>>
>> Does it matter that this is a DA9063L ("Variant 6B")?
>> Do we need a new compatible value, or can this be detected at runtime?
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> could you follow up on this?
Yes, ASAP, once I'm back in the office, currently I'm stuck at the airport.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-24 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-17 2:07 [PATCH] ARM: dts: porter: Add missing PMIC nodes Marek Vasut
2018-02-17 2:07 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-17 2:07 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-18 15:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-18 15:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-23 16:45 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-23 16:45 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-23 16:45 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-24 10:05 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2018-02-24 10:05 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-24 10:05 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-24 22:11 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-24 22:11 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-24 22:11 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-26 10:55 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-26 10:55 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-26 10:55 ` Simon Horman
2018-02-26 11:15 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-26 11:15 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-26 11:15 ` Marek Vasut
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-23 11:43 Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:43 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-23 11:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-23 11:54 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 11:54 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-25 10:09 ` Simon Horman
2018-05-25 10:09 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d93db7c-e65a-e2b3-5a65-a1eb4fa1d60e@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.