* fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? @ 2000-12-21 0:47 Larry McVoy 2000-12-21 3:18 ` David Weinehall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Larry McVoy @ 2000-12-21 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show up in recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? I have a (so far) non-reproducible case where the wrong data showed up in a new file. The nice part is that it was when I was imploding a large BitKeeper patch so I can run the test case over and over if that would help find it. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? 2000-12-21 0:47 fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? Larry McVoy @ 2000-12-21 3:18 ` David Weinehall 2000-12-21 13:31 ` Horst von Brand 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Weinehall @ 2000-12-21 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show up in > recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? Mmmm. Yes. I think the final fixes for this went into v2.4.0-test12pre5, but since there's a test13-pre3 out that needs testing, go for that one directly... :^) > I have a (so far) non-reproducible case where the wrong data showed up in > a new file. The nice part is that it was when I was imploding a large > BitKeeper patch so I can run the test case over and over if that would > help find it. If you can reproduce it on test13-pre3, we have something to worry about, if not, feel happy; one bug less to worry about. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? 2000-12-21 3:18 ` David Weinehall @ 2000-12-21 13:31 ` Horst von Brand 2000-12-21 14:06 ` David Weinehall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Horst von Brand @ 2000-12-21 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Weinehall; +Cc: linux-kernel David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> said: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show up in > > recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? > Mmmm. Yes. I think the final fixes for this went into v2.4.0-test12pre5, > but since there's a test13-pre3 out that needs testing, go for that one > directly... :^) 2.4.0-test13-pre ate /usr/src at home (i686, RH7 + updates): Again, files turn into directories, massive ammounts of duplicate blocks, ... Not as bad as 2.4.0-test11 used to be (/ survived this time ;-) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? 2000-12-21 13:31 ` Horst von Brand @ 2000-12-21 14:06 ` David Weinehall 2000-12-21 15:11 ` Horst von Brand 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Weinehall @ 2000-12-21 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Horst von Brand; +Cc: linux-kernel, Alexander Viro, Linus Torvalds On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:31:56AM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> said: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show > > > up in recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? > > > Mmmm. Yes. I think the final fixes for this went into > > v2.4.0-test12pre5, but since there's a test13-pre3 out that needs > > testing, go for that one directly... :^) > > 2.4.0-test13-pre ate /usr/src at home (i686, RH7 + updates): Again, > files turn into directories, massive ammounts of duplicate blocks, ... > Not as bad as 2.4.0-test11 used to be (/ survived this time ;-) ext2, ext3 or reiserfs (or xfs or jfs or ...) Still, this sounds bad to me. Have you reported this to Linus+Alexander Viro? Oh, never mind, I'm CC:ing them now. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? 2000-12-21 14:06 ` David Weinehall @ 2000-12-21 15:11 ` Horst von Brand 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Horst von Brand @ 2000-12-21 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Weinehall Cc: Horst von Brand, linux-kernel, Alexander Viro, Linus Torvalds David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> said: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:31:56AM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > > David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> said: > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show > > > > up in recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? > > > Mmmm. Yes. I think the final fixes for this went into > > > v2.4.0-test12pre5, but since there's a test13-pre3 out that needs > > > testing, go for that one directly... :^) > > 2.4.0-test13-pre ate /usr/src at home (i686, RH7 + updates): Again, > > files turn into directories, massive ammounts of duplicate blocks, ... > > Not as bad as 2.4.0-test11 used to be (/ survived this time ;-) > ext2, ext3 or reiserfs (or xfs or jfs or ...) ext2. > Still, this sounds bad to me. Have you reported this to Linus+Alexander > Viro? Oh, never mind, I'm CC:ing them now. Nope, didn't. Thanks! -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-21 15:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2000-12-21 0:47 fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? Larry McVoy 2000-12-21 3:18 ` David Weinehall 2000-12-21 13:31 ` Horst von Brand 2000-12-21 14:06 ` David Weinehall 2000-12-21 15:11 ` Horst von Brand
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.