All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: drew@drewb.com
Cc: evaner@bigfoot.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The advantage of modules?
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:02:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010106110215.C4393@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010105225020.A1188@evaner.penguinpowered.com> <14934.44472.612519.658729@champ.drew.net>
In-Reply-To: <14934.44472.612519.658729@champ.drew.net>; from drew@drewb.com on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 06:31:36 +0100


On 2001.01.06 Drew Bertola wrote:
> My best reasons are...
> 
> Development: You don't have to recompile the kernel a billion times
> while working on a driver, you just recompile the module.  Also, you
> can debug, unload, fix, recompile, reload a module to add or fix
> pieces of it all (hopefully) without rebooting.
> 
> Practical usage: When I take my laptop on the road I use ppp, so I
> load it then.  Most of the time I don't need it, so I don't load it.
> 

Usage: I have seen drivers which require params to work, and you can
only give params if the driver is built as a module (ie,
modprobe xxxxxx io=0x300 irq=5, etc...) because your hard is not
properly autodetected by the module.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                                         $> cd pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es                             $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.0-ac2 #6 SMP Sat Jan 6 01:38:26 CET 2001 i686

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-06  4:50 The advantage of modules? Evan Thompson
2001-01-06  5:31 ` Drew Bertola
2001-01-06 10:02   ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-01-08 16:49     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 16:47 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 18:26   ` Ookhoi
2001-01-08 19:05     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 21:50       ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:16         ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 22:14           ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:40             ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 23:06               ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-08 23:49                 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010106110215.C4393@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=drew@drewb.com \
    --cc=evaner@bigfoot.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.