All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: goemon@anime.net (Dan Hollis)
Cc: meissner@spectacle-pond.org (Michael Meissner),
	ookhoi@dds.nl (Ookhoi),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The advantage of modules?
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 22:14:25 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101081414020.19299-100000@anime.net> from "Dan Hollis" at Jan 08, 2001 02:16:05 PM

Dan Hollis writes:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote:
> > I don't believe that is what it's trying to say.  There have been instances
> > in the past where unplugging a SCSI device from a powered on SCSI bus can
> > result in blown terminator power fuses and the like.  Whether this still
> > applies today, I don't know (are active terminators better or worse than
> > passive when it comes to this type of thing?)
> 
> The term SCSI is depreciated as purely a physical layer. We talk SCSI over
> many different physical layers (1394, usb, ata). Of course many of these
> support hot plug natively.

And can you please explain how I can attach this USB Zip drive to this
50-wire SCSI bus please?  Or would you prefer me to call it a bus?
Something with 4 wheels maybe?  Maybe we should depreciate the term "bus"
as well just to remove that confusion. ;)

Seriously though, you can't depreciate a term for referring to a type of
bus without providing some other term to describe said bus.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  |   |         Russell King        rmk@arm.linux.org.uk      --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html   /  /  |
  | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
 /  | | |                                                     ---  |
    +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-08 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-06  4:50 The advantage of modules? Evan Thompson
2001-01-06  5:31 ` Drew Bertola
2001-01-06 10:02   ` J . A . Magallon
2001-01-08 16:49     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 16:47 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 18:26   ` Ookhoi
2001-01-08 19:05     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 21:50       ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:16         ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 22:14           ` Russell King [this message]
2001-01-08 22:40             ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 23:06               ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-08 23:49                 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=goemon@anime.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meissner@spectacle-pond.org \
    --cc=ookhoi@dds.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.