From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Bosko Radivojevic <bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suser checks in 2.2.x
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:39:30 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010109163930.C24523@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010109145610.03b02090@mail.etinc.com> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0101092100320.15661-100000@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0101092100320.15661-100000@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>; from bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100
Em Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100, Bosko Radivojevic escreveu:
> I can see there are a lot of suser() checks. When they will be changed
> with appropriate capable(..) checks? Or, will they be changed, at all some
> days?
I assume: as soon as people send patches, I've send two, IIRC, related
to this today. 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-09 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 9:12 Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 10:17 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-01-09 10:33 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 18:20 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-09 19:57 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-09 20:13 ` suser checks in 2.2.x Bosko Radivojevic
2001-01-09 18:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2001-01-10 18:22 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-10 20:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-10 21:37 ` Dennis
2001-01-10 21:38 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-10 22:08 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-11 10:24 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-11 10:58 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 11:36 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-11 11:58 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:00 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-01-11 16:33 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 16:44 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 11:50 ` PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers " Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 12:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 12:16 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 22:33 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2001-01-15 16:29 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 12:56 ` Drivers " Alan Cox
2001-01-09 10:28 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 16:10 ` [rlug] " Eugen
2001-01-09 19:01 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010109163930.C24523@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.