From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Cc: Matthew O'Keefe <okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] nagging about the LVM usage survey
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:38:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010111153817.A25307@caldera.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010111083114.A381363@brule.borg>; from okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:31:14AM -0600
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:31:14AM -0600, Matthew O'Keefe wrote:
> If more LVM users and developers fill these out and tell
> us what they are doing with LVM, and what their immediate needs are,
> we can better understand where to go in the future.
> We are now starting to define the feature set
> for LVM 5.0.
Why 5.0?
Christoph
--
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-11 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-11 14:31 [linux-lvm] nagging about the LVM usage survey Matthew O'Keefe
2001-01-11 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2001-01-11 15:14 ` Michael J. Declerck
2001-01-11 17:13 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-01-11 16:21 ` Michael E Brown
2001-01-11 14:56 ` Benoit SERRA
2001-01-11 17:20 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-01-12 7:15 ` Benoit SERRA
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-11 18:47 Daniel Mitzlaff
2001-09-20 20:07 XFS to main kernel source Gonyou, Austin
2001-09-20 20:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 20:16 ` Steve Lord
2001-09-20 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 20:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-20 21:31 ` Steve Lord
2001-09-21 3:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-21 3:25 ` Steve Lord
2001-09-21 4:42 ` Nathan Scott
2001-09-21 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-21 8:40 ` Narancs v1
2001-09-21 14:19 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 14:45 ` Steve Lord
2001-09-20 20:40 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 18:03 ` Steve Lord
2001-09-20 20:29 ` Horst von Brand
2001-09-20 20:50 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <adilger@turbolabs.com>
2001-11-06 20:04 ` [PATCH] lp.c, eexpress.c jiffies cleanup Tim Schmielau
2001-11-06 21:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-06 21:37 ` Philip Blundell
2001-11-07 0:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-06 23:58 ` Tim Hockin
2001-11-21 23:32 [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions David C. Hansen
2001-11-22 10:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-11-22 12:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-22 12:30 ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-23 9:44 ` Rick Lindsley
2001-11-23 10:10 ` Oliver.Neukum
2001-11-23 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-23 11:24 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-11-26 17:46 ` David C. Hansen
2001-11-26 19:41 ` Flavio Stanchina
2001-11-26 19:53 ` David C. Hansen
2001-11-23 12:08 ` Rick Lindsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010111153817.A25307@caldera.de \
--to=hch@ns.caldera.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.