From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>
Cc: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>,
"J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:46:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010203214614.D923@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010123205315.A4662@werewolf.able.es> <m3lmrqrspv.fsf@linux.local> <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <m3puh1que4.fsf@linux.local> <20010202215254.C2498@werewolf.able.es> <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com> <m3d7d0pwnr.fsf@linux.local> <3A7C69AB.9C7603A8@transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A7C69AB.9C7603A8@transmeta.com>; from hpa@transmeta.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 21:27:23 +0100
On 02.03 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Christoph Rohland wrote:
> >
> > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> writes:
> >
> > > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?
> > > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...
> >
> > Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there
> > are not a lot of program out there using it.
> >
>
> Do you need it for POSIX shm or not... if so, I would say you do need it
> (even if it's going to take some time until POSIX shm becomes widely
> used.)
>
There was a post recently (that now I can't find), that said the shm
management was done with an interal fs. Was that Posix or sysv shm ?
--
J.A. Magallon $> cd pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer
Linux werewolf 2.4.1-ac2 #1 SMP Sat Feb 3 10:45:59 CET 2001 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-03 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-23 19:53 swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon
2001-02-01 21:39 ` [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
2001-02-01 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-02 9:57 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-02 20:52 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-02 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-03 0:06 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-03 15:02 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-03 14:28 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-03 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-03 20:46 ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-02-04 9:53 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-04 9:18 ` Christoph Rohland
[not found] ` <20010203234550.A507@squish>
[not found] ` <m3zog2n6ec.fsf@linux.local>
[not found] ` <20010205210540.A10316@squish>
2001-02-06 9:18 ` VM question (ramfs abuse) Christoph Rohland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010203214614.D923@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=cr@sap.com \
--cc=hpa@transmeta.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.