From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>
Cc: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1
Date: 03 Feb 2001 15:28:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d7d0pwnr.fsf@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010123205315.A4662@werewolf.able.es> <m3lmrqrspv.fsf@linux.local> <95csna$vb6$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <m3puh1que4.fsf@linux.local> <20010202215254.C2498@werewolf.able.es> <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A7B1EDC.DA2588BA@transmeta.com>
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> writes:
> > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?
> > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...
Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there
are not a lot of program out there using it.
> In some ways it's kind of sad. I found the /dev/shm interface to be
> rather appealing :)
I totally agree :(
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-03 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-23 19:53 swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon
2001-02-01 21:39 ` [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
2001-02-01 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-02 9:57 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-02 20:52 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-02 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-03 0:06 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-03 15:02 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-03 14:28 ` Christoph Rohland [this message]
2001-02-03 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-02-03 20:46 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-02-04 9:53 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-02-04 9:18 ` Christoph Rohland
[not found] ` <20010203234550.A507@squish>
[not found] ` <m3zog2n6ec.fsf@linux.local>
[not found] ` <20010205210540.A10316@squish>
2001-02-06 9:18 ` VM question (ramfs abuse) Christoph Rohland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3d7d0pwnr.fsf@linux.local \
--to=cr@sap.com \
--cc=hpa@transmeta.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.