* Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree?
@ 2001-02-13 21:42 Miles Lane
2001-02-13 21:53 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miles Lane @ 2001-02-13 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/omni/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree?
2001-02-13 21:42 Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree? Miles Lane
@ 2001-02-13 21:53 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bill Nottingham @ 2001-02-13 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Miles Lane (miles@megapathdsl.net) said:
> http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/omni/
Considering it's a ghostscript driver, I severely doubt it. :)
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree?
2001-02-13 21:42 Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree? Miles Lane
2001-02-13 21:53 ` Bill Nottingham
@ 2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
2001-02-13 22:18 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-13 22:34 ` Timur Tabi
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tim Wright @ 2001-02-13 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miles Lane; +Cc: linux-kernel
Maybe I'm missing your point, but why would it go into the kernel tree ?
This is all stuff that gets done in userland under Linux.
The Omni drivers plugin with Ghostscript and generate output appropriate to
the printer. There's no kernel relevance here.
Tim
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:42:27PM -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
> http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/omni/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Tim Wright - timw@splhi.com or timw@aracnet.com or twright@us.ibm.com
IBM Linux Technology Center, Beaverton, Oregon
Interested in Linux scalability ? Look at http://lse.sourceforge.net/
"Nobody ever said I was charming, they said "Rimmer, you're a git!"" RD VI
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree?
2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
@ 2001-02-13 22:18 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-13 22:34 ` Timur Tabi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miles Lane @ 2001-02-13 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: timw; +Cc: linux-kernel
Whoops.
The reason I asked about inclusion is that printing is one of the areas
that Linux seems to struggle in terms of usability and I thought perhaps
it would make sense to modular print drivers in the kernel tree. Since
the OMNI driver is ghostscript-based, including it in the kernel is
obviously a bogus idea. Sorry for missing the obvious.
I do wonder if there are no print drivers that would make sense in the
kernel tree. After all, we have USB device drivers in the tree,
including
scanners, which aren't all that different from printers, are they?
I apologize in advance if I am just being incredibly stupid about this.
Miles
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree?
2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
2001-02-13 22:18 ` Miles Lane
@ 2001-02-13 22:34 ` Timur Tabi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2001-02-13 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
** Reply to message from Miles Lane <miles@megapathdsl.net> on 13 Feb 2001
14:18:43 -0800
> The reason I asked about inclusion is that printing is one of the areas
> that Linux seems to struggle in terms of usability and I thought perhaps
> it would make sense to modular print drivers in the kernel tree.
No, improving printing support is something that the distribution vendors are
supposed to provide.
I think you're under the assumption that this support were to be placed in the
kernel, it would then become ubiquitous. That may be true, but it's irrelevant.
Instead, what is needed is a sort of "standard" that indicates what every Linux
distribution should have in addition to the kernel. And that's something that's
being addressed by organization such as the Linux Standard Base
(http://www.linuxbase.org/). You should ask them about it.
--
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only. Don't send another copy to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-13 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-13 21:42 Will the IBM OMNI printer driver be making its way into the kernel tree? Miles Lane
2001-02-13 21:53 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-13 22:05 ` Tim Wright
2001-02-13 22:18 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-13 22:34 ` Timur Tabi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.