All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>
To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:56:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010511095628.D8495@sonycom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010510162221.A1736@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:22:21PM -0300


> > To get the new targets working correctly:
> > 	* new binutils
> > 	* new gcc built with new binutils (does the 2.95.4 branch have the
> >         changes, or only 3.0?)
> > 	* new libc built with new gcc
> > 	* rebuild gcc with the new libc
> > 
> > Am I missing anything?
> 
> The latter three steps are not necessary.

To avoid any further confusion, which then are the versions 
( & patches ) of binutils / gcc / libc needed to get a
linux mips toolchain we can use until the end of time? 

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-11  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-05 12:47 Binary compatibility break understood ? Florian Lohoff
2001-05-07 19:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-08 18:25   ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09  0:43     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09  7:59       ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-09  8:46         ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 12:14           ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:27             ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 12:51               ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:45                 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:59                   ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 13:49                     ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 14:06                       ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 14:15                         ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:07                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 13:18                   ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:37                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 18:09                     ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 18:59                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 19:16                         ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:43                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-10  2:11                             ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:17                       ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 19:24                         ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-10 18:08             ` Ryan Murray
2001-05-10 19:22               ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-11  7:56                 ` Tom Appermont [this message]
2001-05-11  9:26                   ` Keith M Wesolowski
2001-05-11 10:42                     ` Tom Appermont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010511095628.D8495@sonycom.com \
    --to=tea@sonycom.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.