From: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 07:51:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AF93D3F.5E57070@cotw.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: hoeltyemh0.fsf@gee.suse.de
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> Ok, I finally understand. Can you send a new patch for glibc with an
> update for the FAQ? I'll add it this time.
>
diff -urN glibc-2.2.3/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in glibc-2.2.3-patched/sysdeps/
mips/rtld-ldscript.in
--- glibc-2.2.3/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in Sat Jul 12 18:23:14 1997
+++ glibc-2.2.3-patched/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in Sun Apr 29 22:32:35 2001
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-OUTPUT_FORMAT("@@rtld-oformat@@")
OUTPUT_ARCH(@@rtld-arch@@)
ENTRY(@@rtld-entry@@)
SECTIONS
There's the patch. It's not much but it is correct. I have built multiple
toolchains and such using this patch. GCC out of CVS both the 3.0 and
cutting edge branch work without patches for Linux. And as mentioned
earlier, binutils is already fixed. As far as FAQ update...what do you
want?
-Steve
--
Steven J. Hill - Embedded SW Engineer
Public Key: 'http://www.cotw.com/pubkey.txt'
FPR1: E124 6E1C AF8E 7802 A815
FPR2: 7D72 829C 3386 4C4A E17D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-09 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-05 12:47 Binary compatibility break understood ? Florian Lohoff
2001-05-07 19:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-08 18:25 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 0:43 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 7:59 ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-09 8:46 ` Florian Lohoff
2001-05-09 12:14 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 12:27 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 12:51 ` Steven J. Hill [this message]
2001-05-09 12:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:59 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 13:49 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 14:06 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 14:15 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:07 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 13:18 ` Andreas Jaeger
2001-05-09 13:37 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 18:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 18:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-09 19:16 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:43 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-05-10 2:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-09 19:17 ` Steven J. Hill
2001-05-09 19:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-10 18:08 ` Ryan Murray
2001-05-10 19:22 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-11 7:56 ` Tom Appermont
2001-05-11 9:26 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2001-05-11 10:42 ` Tom Appermont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AF93D3F.5E57070@cotw.com \
--to=sjhill@cotw.com \
--cc=aj@suse.de \
--cc=flo@rfc822.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tea@sonycom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.