From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:54:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010520235409.G2647@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105200957500.323-100000@mikeg.weiden.de> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105200546241.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105200546241.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>; from Rik van Riel on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:49:09AM -0300
Hi!
> > You're right. It should never dump too much data at once. OTOH, if
> > those cleaned pages are really old (front of reclaim list), there's no
> > value in keeping them either. Maybe there should be a slow bleed for
> > mostly idle or lightly loaded conditions.
>
> If you don't think it's worthwhile keeping the oldest pages
> in memory around, please hand me your excess DIMMS ;)
Sorry, Rik, you can't have that that DIMM. You know, you are
developing memory managment, and we can't have you having too much
memory available ;-).
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:54:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010520235409.G2647@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105200546241.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>; from Rik van Riel on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:49:09AM -0300
Hi!
> > You're right. It should never dump too much data at once. OTOH, if
> > those cleaned pages are really old (front of reclaim list), there's no
> > value in keeping them either. Maybe there should be a slow bleed for
> > mostly idle or lightly loaded conditions.
>
> If you don't think it's worthwhile keeping the oldest pages
> in memory around, please hand me your excess DIMMS ;)
Sorry, Rik, you can't have that that DIMM. You know, you are
developing memory managment, and we can't have you having too much
memory available ;-).
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-21 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-17 16:45 Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-05-17 17:36 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 17:16 ` Chris Evans
2001-05-17 17:37 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-17 17:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 21:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 3:55 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 4:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 6:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 17:08 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 17:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 18:19 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:19 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 18:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 18:58 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:58 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 20:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 20:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 20:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 22:44 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 22:44 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 22:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-18 22:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-19 2:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19 2:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19 2:32 ` Mike Castle
2001-05-19 2:32 ` Mike Castle
2001-05-19 6:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 6:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 17:13 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 17:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 3:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 3:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 6:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 6:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 8:49 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20 9:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 9:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 10:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-21 13:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-21 13:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 21:54 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2001-05-20 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:32 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-21 20:32 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-23 15:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-23 15:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-25 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-23 17:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-05-23 17:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-05-23 17:51 ` Scott Anderson
2001-05-23 17:51 ` Scott Anderson
2001-05-25 8:10 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-25 8:10 ` David Weinehall
2001-05-25 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-25 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-04 19:22 ` RPM Installation - Compilation errors jalaja devi
2001-06-04 19:22 ` jalaja devi
2001-05-24 8:48 ` [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 8:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 9:10 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 9:10 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 11:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 11:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 14:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 15:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-20 15:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-20 17:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 17:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 13:44 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-05-20 13:44 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-05-20 17:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 17:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 19:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-20 19:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-20 21:37 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-21 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-21 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 21:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-20 21:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-21 3:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-21 3:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-17 17:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-05-17 18:33 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2001-05-17 18:40 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-17 18:51 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-17 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 18:46 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-17 19:00 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-05-17 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-17 19:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-17 20:52 ` Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops FAVRE Gregoire
2001-05-17 21:41 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-18 11:28 ` FAVRE Gregoire
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-20 0:52 [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Dieter Nützel
[not found] <200105200225107.SM01044@paloma16.e0k.nbg-hannover.de>
2001-05-20 3:40 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010520235409.G2647@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.