From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"ZINKEVICIUS,MATT (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <matt_zinkevicius@hp.com>
Subject: Re: patch: highmem zero-bounce
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:45:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010706154552.G5889@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010626182215.C14460@suse.de> <20010627114155.A31910@athlon.random> <20010627182745.D17905@suse.de> <20010627184908.E17905@suse.de> <20010627190626.E24623@athlon.random> <20010627191229.G17905@suse.de> <20010706154138.O2425@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010706154138.O2425@athlon.random>
On Fri, Jul 06 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:12:29PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Humm yes, I agree. I'll redo it tonight and send an updated
> > incremental. Hopefully I'll be able to upload a new full version too.
>
> I was going to integrate the avoid-bounce-buffer support but I don't
> find anything recent except the bio patch for 2.5 that you uploaded
> yesterday:
>
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe > find -mtime -1
> ./v2.5
> ./v2.5/bio-14-pre4
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe > find -mtime -25
> ./v2.5
> ./v2.5/bio-14-pre4
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe >
Yes that's all yet, I haven't done a new block-highmem just for 2.4 just
yet.
> The bio patch would better be 2.5 material, I'd prefer only skipping the
> bounce between 1G to 4G in 2.4. Could you make a new patch with only the
> bounce skip between 1G and 4G against pre3?
Will do, but it will probably be after the weekend jfyi.
> btw, the latest bio patch from yesterday is still broken with respect to
> nested irqs:
[snip]
Duh yes thanks for looking at that, it's not surprising as I haven't
taken time to look at this properly yet. That's also why the 2.4 patch
wasn't ready as soon as I would've liked. Thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"ZINKEVICIUS,MATT (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <matt_zinkevicius@hp.com>
Subject: Re: patch: highmem zero-bounce
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:45:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010706154552.G5889@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010706154138.O2425@athlon.random>
On Fri, Jul 06 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:12:29PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Humm yes, I agree. I'll redo it tonight and send an updated
> > incremental. Hopefully I'll be able to upload a new full version too.
>
> I was going to integrate the avoid-bounce-buffer support but I don't
> find anything recent except the bio patch for 2.5 that you uploaded
> yesterday:
>
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe > find -mtime -1
> ./v2.5
> ./v2.5/bio-14-pre4
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe > find -mtime -25
> ./v2.5
> ./v2.5/bio-14-pre4
> andrea@athlon:~/mirror/kernel.org/people/axboe >
Yes that's all yet, I haven't done a new block-highmem just for 2.4 just
yet.
> The bio patch would better be 2.5 material, I'd prefer only skipping the
> bounce between 1G to 4G in 2.4. Could you make a new patch with only the
> bounce skip between 1G and 4G against pre3?
Will do, but it will probably be after the weekend jfyi.
> btw, the latest bio patch from yesterday is still broken with respect to
> nested irqs:
[snip]
Duh yes thanks for looking at that, it's not surprising as I haven't
taken time to look at this properly yet. That's also why the 2.4 patch
wasn't ready as soon as I would've liked. Thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-06 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-26 16:22 patch: highmem zero-bounce Jens Axboe
2001-06-27 9:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-06-27 9:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-06-27 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2001-06-27 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2001-06-27 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2001-06-27 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-06-27 17:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-06-27 17:12 ` Jens Axboe
2001-06-27 17:12 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-06 13:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-06 13:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-06 13:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-07-06 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2001-07-06 13:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-06 13:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010706154552.G5889@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matt_zinkevicius@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.