Re: [semiPATCH] another vxfs fix

Re: [semiPATCH] another vxfs fix

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 12:43:48AM +0000, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> 
> With the brelse() fix, a failed vxfs mount is OK.
> But after a successful vxfs mount the umount still yields
>   VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice day
> (And today's [yesterday's] patch by Christoph makes no difference.)
> 
> The reason is that the routine vxfs_fake_inode() does
> new_inode(), but this inode is never returned.
> I fixed this but am not sure against which base source
> the patch should be described.
> A minimal version would be to change the six [1] calls of
> 	vxfs_put_inode()
> in vxfs_super.c into calls of
> 	iput()
> 
> (In my source I turned vxfs_fake_inode() into vxfs_get_fake_inode()
> and added vxfs_put_fake_inode() that just does iput().)

Sounds fine - just submit me any version and I'll rebase it against
the latest Linus and Alan trees.

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.