From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
Cc: mauelshagen@sistina.com, Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, lvm-devel@sistina.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
sistina@sistina.com, mge@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Saying you "need" the old versions of the installed tools to read the
> on disk data is bogus, IMNSHO. You could easily have a flag which says
> "calculate the PE offsets using the old algorithm or the new algorithm".
Definitely. This is what I was asking for. That would be optimal.
> Also, since this bug exists only for a limited number of users (only a
> subset of users who created volumes with beta 5 and beta 6), it causes
> grief for anyone who is NOT affected by the bug.
Agreed. I understand that here I am biased but I don't care much about
that possible misalignment too because we never shipped a beta[56].
> Well, that is the future, and should not impact users of 2.4.x kernels.
> Just like we found an acceptable workaround to the (incompatible) IOP 11
> change (which was later reverted), it is possible to find an acceptable
> workaround for the new incompatible change. Sadly, it is no longer my
Agreed.
Andrea
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
Cc: mauelshagen@sistina.com, Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, lvm-devel@sistina.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
sistina@sistina.com, mge@sistina.com
Subject: Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010815185005.A32239@sistina.com> <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int>
In-Reply-To: <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Saying you "need" the old versions of the installed tools to read the
> on disk data is bogus, IMNSHO. You could easily have a flag which says
> "calculate the PE offsets using the old algorithm or the new algorithm".
Definitely. This is what I was asking for. That would be optimal.
> Also, since this bug exists only for a limited number of users (only a
> subset of users who created volumes with beta 5 and beta 6), it causes
> grief for anyone who is NOT affected by the bug.
Agreed. I understand that here I am biased but I don't care much about
that possible misalignment too because we never shipped a beta[56].
> Well, that is the future, and should not impact users of 2.4.x kernels.
> Just like we found an acceptable workaround to the (incompatible) IOP 11
> change (which was later reverted), it is possible to find an acceptable
> workaround for the new incompatible change. Sadly, it is no longer my
Agreed.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-15 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-15 15:56 [linux-lvm] *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 15:56 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 16:25 ` [linux-lvm] " Kurt Garloff
2001-08-15 16:25 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-15 16:50 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 16:50 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 17:04 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 17:21 ` [linux-lvm] " Eric M. Hopper
2001-08-15 20:06 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 20:06 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 20:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 20:20 ` [lvm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2001-08-15 21:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 20:24 ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-08-16 10:05 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 17:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-15 17:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-17 9:16 ` [linux-lvm] " Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-17 10:23 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-17 14:56 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 17:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-15 17:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-15 20:13 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 21:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-08-15 21:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-16 10:08 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 19:14 ` Hubert Mantel
2001-08-15 19:14 ` Hubert Mantel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@sistina.com \
--cc=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=mge@sistina.com \
--cc=sistina@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.