From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk>
Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, riel@conectiva.com.br,
jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:10:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010906171049.4d40da02.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <598034578.999792124@[10.132.112.53]>
In-Reply-To: <20010906163909.186b8b46.skraw@ithnet.com> <598034578.999792124@[10.132.112.53]>
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:02:04 +0100 Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
<linux-kernel@alex.org.uk> wrote:
> Stephan,
> >> You yourself proved this, by switching rsize,wsize to 1k and said
> >> it all worked fine! (unless I misread your email).
> >
> > Sorry, misunderstanding: I did not touch rsize/wsize. What I do is to lower
fs
> > action by not letting knfsd walk through the subtrees of a mounted fs. This
> > leads to less allocs/frees by the fs layer which tend to fail and let knfs
fail
> > afterwards.
>
> OK, I'm getting confused.
To end that:
What I meant was, I did not touch the values most everybody uses on NFS, which
is:
rsize=8192,wsize=8192
Using smaller values (or default = 1024) gives such a ridicolously bad
performance that I would even prefer samba.
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-06 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-28 3:36 page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-28 18:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-28 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-30 1:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-03 14:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 15:26 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-04 15:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 17:14 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-04 15:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 19:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 11:52 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 12:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 12:32 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 12:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 13:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 13:18 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-09-06 13:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 13:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-06 13:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 16:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 16:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 17:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 19:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 19:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 19:52 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-07 0:32 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-09-06 19:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-06 17:35 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-06 13:10 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-09-06 13:23 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 13:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-09-06 14:01 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 14:39 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-09-06 15:02 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 15:07 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109061206020.31200-100000@imladris.rielhome.con ectiva>
2001-09-06 15:16 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 15:10 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2001-09-06 15:18 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 17:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 17:32 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 13:54 ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-06 14:39 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-06 16:20 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-09-06 17:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 17:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 21:01 ` [RFC] Defragmentation proposal: preventative maintenance and cleanup [LONG] Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-07 6:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-07 8:58 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-07 9:15 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-07 9:28 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-07 21:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-07 21:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-07 12:30 ` page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-09-04 16:27 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-04 17:13 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-04 15:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 17:54 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-04 16:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 18:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-04 19:39 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-04 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-06 11:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-04 19:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-04 18:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-04 20:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-04 22:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-05 2:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-06 11:18 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-04 17:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-09-04 20:43 ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-06 11:21 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <20010828180108Z16193-32383+2058@humbolt.nl.linux.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108281110540.8754-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-28 19:14 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-28 20:01 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-28 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-28 20:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-29 13:48 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-29 13:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-29 14:38 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-27 23:14 Samium Gromoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010906171049.4d40da02.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@alex.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.