From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:58:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010916155835.C24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a 2.2 kernel that I can use for comparison to the latest
2.4 kernels I've been testing, but I came accross a little problem with the
patches I've been trying to combine.
I've already applied:
ide.2.2.19.05042001.patch
linux-2.2.19.kdb.diff
linux-2.2.19.ext3.diff
And now I'm trying to apply raid-2.2.19-A1, and I get one reject in
include/linux/fs.h.
***************
*** 191,197 ****
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
/*
* Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16
--- 191,196 ----
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
+ #define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
/*
* Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16
Now I have two defines from different patches for the same bit. The top
line is from RAID, and bottom is of ext3 origin.
#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
#define BH_Temp 8 /* 1 if the buffer is temporary (unlinked)
Is this a fatal conflict? How can I resolve this?
Mike
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-16 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-16 22:58 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-16 23:09 ` Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19 Lehmann
2001-09-17 1:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-17 4:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-18 11:08 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-18 19:24 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-19 20:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-19 22:35 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-21 13:10 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-09-21 22:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 21:17 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010916155835.C24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.