From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
bcrl@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:31:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928193147.R24922@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109281704.VAA04444@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281420180.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281420180.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Then how would you explain the 10% speed difference
> Ben and others have seen with gigabit ethernet ?
partly because of the unwakeup logic, I've no problem with it, this is
why I asked to measure how much of the 10% improvement cames from the
unwakeup/ksoftirqd-deschedule logic, I was just curious about that.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-28 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-26 16:44 [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 17:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-09-26 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 18:55 ` Russell King
2001-09-26 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 23:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 3:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:18 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Simon Kirby
2001-09-28 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:31 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 16:18 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 kuznet
2001-09-28 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:04 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-09-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:39 ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:56 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:23 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 16:35 ` kuznet
2001-09-30 9:37 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-09-30 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:39 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-28 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:35 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B3 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 0:40 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-09-29 11:03 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-27 23:29 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 0:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 2:50 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928193147.R24922@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.