From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
Date: 30 Sep 2001 11:37:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89pdkdu1w-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109291635.UAA17377@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200109291635.UAA17377@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote on 29.09.01 in <200109291635.UAA17377@ms2.inr.ac.ru>:
> Essentially, if we invent some real condition when softirq loop must be
> stopped, we win. Now it is "stop after all events pending at start are
> processed". OK, it is wrong. You propose: "10 rounds". It is even worse
> because it is against plain logic. (pardon :-)).
The way I understand from this thread, the condition is *not* "10 rounds",
it is "no more new softirqs are pending when we want to leave" - except it
does a sort of emergency abort if 10 rounds weren't enough to get to that
condition.
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-30 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-26 16:44 [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 17:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-09-26 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 18:55 ` Russell King
2001-09-26 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 23:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 3:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:18 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Simon Kirby
2001-09-28 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:31 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 16:18 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 kuznet
2001-09-28 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:04 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:39 ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:56 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:23 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 16:35 ` kuznet
2001-09-30 9:37 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2001-09-30 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:39 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-28 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:35 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B3 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 0:40 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-09-29 11:03 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-27 23:29 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 0:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 2:50 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89pdkdu1w-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.