From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
To: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, Terminator <jimmy@mtc.dhs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are -final releases realy FINAL? (Was Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device)
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:27:30 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011107092730.A11860@bee.lk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111051936090.18663-100000@www.mtc.dhs.org> <20011105194316.B665@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <1005019360.897.2.camel@phantasy> <20011107091314.A11202@bee.lk> <20011106191747.A20245@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011106191747.A20245@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>; from mfedyk@matchmail.com on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 07:17:47PM -0800
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 07:17:47PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> Here here.
>
> You'd almost expect this from XP-beta to XP-final, but not Linux kernel...
Few points.
- I don't believe that there is any such thing stable enough to be caled
XP-final, or even XP-beta ;) Specially when compared to the Linux kernel
standards of stability.
- It is not necessary to compare linux with other low grade software ;)
They may not work. But linux do.
- I nevey use nor plan to use XP so I don't care if it doesn't work.
> Sorry, couldn't resist.
I couldn't, too ;)
Regards,
Anuradha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13)
Three hours a day will produce as much as a man ought to write.
-- Trollope
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-06 3:39 kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device Terminator
2001-11-06 3:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-06 4:02 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:08 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-06 4:14 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 12:13 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-07 20:49 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:11 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-07 21:34 ` J Sloan
2001-11-07 11:58 ` rpjday
2001-11-07 21:44 ` J Sloan
2001-11-07 21:41 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:40 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 3:13 ` Are -final releases realy FINAL? (Was Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-07 3:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 3:27 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera [this message]
2001-11-07 3:24 ` Michael H. Warfield
2001-11-07 4:06 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011107092730.A11860@bee.lk \
--to=anuradha@gnu.org \
--cc=jimmy@mtc.dhs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.