From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
To: rpjday <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 13:44:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE9AB3A.DFC6855F@lexus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111070656540.4140-100000@localhost.localdomain>
rpjday wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, J Sloan wrote:
>
> > "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 03:49 PM, Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:
> > >
> > > > when mounting an EFS cd on the loop it also froze. this is _without_
> > > > removing the lines. ...
> > >
> > > I'm a little confused. How did you even get a working kernel (or module)
> > > without removing the lines?
> > >
> >
> > Probably compiled it modular -
>
> if you try to compile it modular, the "make modules" will work, but
> the "make modules_install" will choke after copying the modules under
> /lib/modules when it tries to run the final "depmod" at the end.
>
> so, yes, i'm curious -- how did he get a final kernel and modules
> without removing those lines?
I got a kernel and modules without removing those
lines - it complains at depmod, but the kernel and
modules do build and install -
I didn't ever boot to that kernel since the warning
bothered me, and I fixed the source and recompiled
before booting into 2.4.14 -
cu
jjs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-06 3:39 kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device Terminator
2001-11-06 3:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-06 4:02 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:08 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-06 4:14 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 12:13 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-07 20:49 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:11 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-07 21:34 ` J Sloan
2001-11-07 11:58 ` rpjday
2001-11-07 21:44 ` J Sloan [this message]
2001-11-07 21:41 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:40 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 3:13 ` Are -final releases realy FINAL? (Was Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-07 3:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 3:27 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-07 3:24 ` Michael H. Warfield
2001-11-07 4:06 ` David Lang
[not found] <no.id>
2001-11-07 15:12 ` kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device Barry K. Nathan
2001-11-07 15:21 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-07 15:38 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-07 15:48 ` Mohammad A. Haque
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE9AB3A.DFC6855F@lexus.com \
--to=jjs@lexus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.