From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, config-patches@gnu.org
Subject: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:36:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011206103605.A7366@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011206155724.A11083@dea.linux-mips.net>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:57:24PM -0200
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:57:24PM -0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:35:06AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
>
> > The byteorder field is emoved from /proc/cpuinfo in the current 2.4
> > kernel in CVS. It breaks config.guess used by all the GNU softwares.
>
> Grrr... In the past config.guess used gcc to compile a test program using
> gcc. I told sometime ago to whoever it was that I'm going to remove
> all non-cpu related information (endianess should be considered per
> _thread_ on MIPS!) from /proc/cpuinfo where it has no business; the /proc
> rewrite in 2.4.15 more or less forced me into this.
>
How about this patch?
H.J.
---
2001-12-06 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
* config.guess: Properly handle Linux/mips.
--- config.guess.mips Mon Nov 5 08:09:32 2001
+++ config.guess Thu Dec 6 10:31:40 2001
@@ -767,10 +767,21 @@ EOF
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-linux-gnu
exit 0 ;;
mips:Linux:*:*)
- case `sed -n '/^byte/s/^.*: \(.*\) endian/\1/p' < /proc/cpuinfo` in
- big) echo mips-unknown-linux-gnu && exit 0 ;;
- little) echo mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu && exit 0 ;;
- esac
+ eval $set_cc_for_build
+ cat >$dummy.c <<EOF
+#if defined(__MIPSEL__) || defined(__MIPSEL) || defined(_MIPSEL) || defined(MIPSEL)
+cpu=mipsel
+#endif
+#if defined(__MIPSEB__) || defined(__MIPSEB) || defined(_MIPSEB) || defined(MIPSEB)
+cpu=mips
+#endif
+EOF
+ cpu=
+ eval `$CC_FOR_BUILD -E $dummy.c | grep cpu=`;
+ rm -f $dummy.c
+ if test -n "$cpu"; then
+ echo $cpu-unknown-linux-gnu && exit 0
+ fi
;;
ppc:Linux:*:*)
echo powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-06 17:35 Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo? H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 17:53 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 17:57 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-06 18:36 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
2001-12-06 18:41 ` PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?) Ralf Baechle
2001-12-06 18:51 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 19:16 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-10 7:23 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 9:42 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-10 23:34 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 23:34 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:20 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-11 0:23 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:28 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-10 18:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-10 20:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-12-10 23:40 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 23:40 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-12-11 13:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-11 23:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-12 8:07 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 18:40 ` Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo? Dominic Sweetman
2001-12-10 19:06 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011206103605.A7366@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=config-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.