From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, config-patches@gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:16:17 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011206171617.B11840@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011206105142.A7995@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > How about this patch?
> >
> > Looks good to me except that checking for __MIPSE[LB]__ should be
> > sufficient. Anything that doesn't provide these two symbols wouldn't
> > have the chance of a snowball in hell to work.
> >
>
> I added those just in case someone wants to use a different compiler
> to bootstrap gcc on Linux/mips :-). I don't think it will hurt anyhing.
Sure, it won't. And those guys who don't use a Linux/MIPS compiler seem
to be decieded to have _alot_ of extra fun anyway :-)
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-06 17:35 Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo? H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 17:53 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 17:57 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-06 18:36 ` PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?) H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 18:41 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-06 18:51 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-06 19:16 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-12-10 7:23 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 9:42 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-10 23:34 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 23:34 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:20 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-11 0:23 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:28 ` H . J . Lu
2001-12-10 18:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-10 20:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-12-10 23:40 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 23:40 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-11 0:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-12-11 13:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-11 23:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-12 8:07 ` Ben Elliston
2001-12-10 18:40 ` Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo? Dominic Sweetman
2001-12-10 19:06 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011206171617.B11840@dea.linux-mips.net \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=config-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.