All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Brendan Pike <spike@superweb.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IDE Harddrive Performance
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:44:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011219174456.A27487@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011219153233.GA3424@leukertje.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de> <01121911444703.31762@spikes> <20011219160143.GA8658@gondor.com> <01121912181304.31762@spikes>
In-Reply-To: <01121912181304.31762@spikes>; from spike@superweb.ca on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:13PM -0400

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:13PM -0400, Brendan Pike wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2001 12:01 pm, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:44:47AM -0400, Brendan Pike wrote:
> > > I dont really know, I dont think its possible to get higher then that
> > > from a 5400 RPM disk. Heres mine,
> >
> > /dev/hda:
> >  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.32 seconds = 27.59 MB/sec
> >
> > bash-2.05a# cat /proc/ide/hda/model
> > Maxtor 98196H8
> >
> > This is a 5400rpm drive, too.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> wowie, that is quite slow then. well udma33 mode is probebly why. if getting 
> an ata100 offboard card (since i have an ata100 drive) would make such a big 
> differance, im all for it. would there be any others reasons for such 
> slowness? is udma33 capible of more then 9MB/sec ??

Yes. Reaching up to 16 MB/sec with udma33 is quite possible.

> [root@spikes spike]# cat /proc/ide/via
> ----------VIA BusMastering IDE Configuration----------------
> Driver Version:                     3.29
> South Bridge:                       VIA vt82c586b
> Revision:                           ISA 0x47 IDE 0x6
> Highest DMA rate:                   UDMA33
> BM-DMA base:                        0xe000
> PCI clock:                          33MHz
> Master Read  Cycle IRDY:            1ws
> Master Write Cycle IRDY:            1ws
> BM IDE Status Register Read Retry:  yes
> Max DRDY Pulse Width:               No limit
> -----------------------Primary IDE-------Secondary IDE------
> Read DMA FIFO flush:          yes                 yes
> End Sector FIFO flush:         no                  no
> Prefetch Buffer:              yes                 yes
> Post Write Buffer:            yes                  no
> Enabled:                      yes                 yes
> Simplex only:                  no                  no
> Cable Type:                   40w                 40w
> -------------------drive0----drive1----drive2----drive3-----
> Transfer Mode:       UDMA       PIO       PIO       PIO
> Address Setup:       30ns     120ns      30ns     120ns
> Cmd Active:          90ns      90ns      90ns      90ns
> Cmd Recovery:        30ns      30ns      30ns      30ns
> Data Active:         90ns     330ns      90ns     330ns
> Data Recovery:       30ns     270ns      30ns     270ns
> Cycle Time:          90ns     600ns     120ns     600ns
> Transfer Rate:   22.0MB/s   3.3MB/s  16.5MB/s   3.3MB/s
> 
> dont know if that info would help much but there it is. also uses the via 
> kernel driver.

But for some reason your drive is running at udma22 (udma1). 

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-12-19 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-19 15:32 IDE Harddrive Performance Thomas Deselaers
2001-12-19 15:44 ` Brendan Pike
2001-12-19 15:55   ` Lee Packham
2001-12-19 16:01   ` Jan Niehusmann
2001-12-19 16:18     ` Brendan Pike
2001-12-19 16:28       ` Oleg Artamonov
2001-12-19 16:44       ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2001-12-19 16:59     ` Dmitry Pogosyan
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112191101230.4575-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-12-19 16:37     ` Thomas Deselaers
2001-12-19 17:34   ` Mike Dresser
2001-12-19 15:55 ` Oleg Artamonov
2001-12-19 16:05   ` Thomas Deselaers
2001-12-19 16:15     ` Oleg Artamonov
2001-12-19 16:32       ` Thomas Deselaers
2001-12-19 16:38 ` Holger Lubitz
2001-12-22  8:21 ` Adam Keys
2001-12-22  8:56   ` Alan Cox
2001-12-22 10:10     ` Adam Keys
     [not found]       ` <01122215090500.01870@manta>
2001-12-22 13:23         ` Thomas Deselaers
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-20 13:12 Brendan Pike
2001-12-20 17:10 Brendan Pike
2001-12-20 17:22 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-12-20 17:41   ` Sebastian Dröge
2001-12-20 19:25 Brendan Pike
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112201307120.9437-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-12-20 19:33 ` Brendan Pike
2001-12-22 18:20 Jim Radford
2001-12-22 21:36 ` Craig Knox
2001-12-23  8:11 ` Adam Keys
2001-12-23 17:55 Wayne Whitney
2001-12-23 18:37 ` Mark Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011219174456.A27487@suse.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=spike@superweb.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.