* [linux-lvm] LE discussion
@ 2002-01-02 21:46 Adrian Noland
2002-01-02 22:06 ` Adrian Noland
2002-01-03 11:26 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Noland @ 2002-01-02 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Hello,
I'm starting to use LVM, and I would like to know the pros & cons of
using a different LE size other than the 4mb default. What kind of
performance issues are there with different size LE's? I saw a *very*
brief discussion in one of the docs (not the HOWTO), but cant find the
reference now.
Thanks,
Adrian
=====
"Palm Pilots are the Pet Rocks of the portable computing world"-Dan East
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LE discussion
2002-01-02 21:46 [linux-lvm] LE discussion Adrian Noland
@ 2002-01-02 22:06 ` Adrian Noland
2002-01-02 22:26 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-03 11:26 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Noland @ 2002-01-02 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Thought I would qualify a little bit more.... I'm planning on using
this box as an all-purpose server HTTP/PHP/DNS/SMTP/SQL etc... So, my
question is in this context. Thanks again.
--- Adrian Noland <anoland@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm starting to use LVM, and I would like to know the pros & cons of
> using a different LE size other than the 4mb default. What kind of
> performance issues are there with different size LE's? I saw a *very*
> brief discussion in one of the docs (not the HOWTO), but cant find
> the
> reference now.
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> =====
> "Palm Pilots are the Pet Rocks of the portable computing world"-Dan
> East
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
=====
"Palm Pilots are the Pet Rocks of the portable computing world"-Dan East
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LE discussion
2002-01-02 22:06 ` Adrian Noland
@ 2002-01-02 22:26 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-15 9:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Head @ 2002-01-02 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm, Adrian Noland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The only mention I have seen about this topic is in the mail archives:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-lvm&m=99965651611876&w=2
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:08, Adrian Noland wrote:
> Thought I would qualify a little bit more.... I'm planning on using
> this box as an all-purpose server HTTP/PHP/DNS/SMTP/SQL etc... So, my
> question is in this context. Thanks again.
>
> --- Adrian Noland <anoland@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm starting to use LVM, and I would like to know the pros & cons of
> > using a different LE size other than the 4mb default. What kind of
> > performance issues are there with different size LE's? I saw a *very*
> > brief discussion in one of the docs (not the HOWTO), but cant find
> > the
> > reference now.
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
- --
Adrian Head
(Public Key available on request.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8M93p8ZJI8OvSkAcRAnDeAKChLqh0aLveEbnR99c9a04YoK5rAQCfc3r4
XQa4dUatd7GbDLubk0mC/ps=
=39IF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LE discussion
2002-01-02 22:26 ` Adrian Head
@ 2002-01-15 9:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2002-01-15 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:28:21PM +1000, Adrian Head wrote:
> The only mention I have seen about this topic is in the mail archives:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-lvm&m=99965651611876&w=2
I added something to the vgcreate(8) man page in CVS already.
>
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:08, Adrian Noland wrote:
> > Thought I would qualify a little bit more.... I'm planning on using
> > this box as an all-purpose server HTTP/PHP/DNS/SMTP/SQL etc... So, my
> > question is in this context. Thanks again.
> >
> > --- Adrian Noland <anoland@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm starting to use LVM, and I would like to know the pros & cons of
> > > using a different LE size other than the 4mb default. What kind of
> > > performance issues are there with different size LE's? I saw a *very*
> > > brief discussion in one of the docs (not the HOWTO), but cant find
> > > the
> > > reference now.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Adrian
> > >
>
> --
> Adrian Head
>
> (Public Key available on request.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LE discussion
2002-01-02 21:46 [linux-lvm] LE discussion Adrian Noland
2002-01-02 22:06 ` Adrian Noland
@ 2002-01-03 11:26 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2002-01-03 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Noland; +Cc: linux-lvm
On Jan 02, 2002 19:48 -0800, Adrian Noland wrote:
> I'm starting to use LVM, and I would like to know the pros & cons of
> using a different LE size other than the 4mb default. What kind of
> performance issues are there with different size LE's? I saw a *very*
> brief discussion in one of the docs (not the HOWTO), but cant find the
> reference now.
LE size will not likely affect performance, because they are so large.
The only reason for using larger LE size is if you want to have very
large LVs. With the default 4MB LE size, you have a maximum LV size
of 256GB. With a 16MB LE size, you have a max LV size of 1TB (which
is the largest that Linux will reliably support at present). If you
expect to increase the size of a particular LV more than that in the
future (when Linux supports it), scale your LE size accordingly.
Note that you waste about 1.5 LEs of space per PV with the current
LVM tools, so you don't want to over do the LE size.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-15 9:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-02 21:46 [linux-lvm] LE discussion Adrian Noland
2002-01-02 22:06 ` Adrian Noland
2002-01-02 22:26 ` Adrian Head
2002-01-15 9:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-01-03 11:26 ` Andreas Dilger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.