From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com>
Cc: dalecki@evision-ventures.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:58:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020127225845.1bc1453a.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020126171545.GB11344@fefe.de> <3C52E671.605FA2F3@mandrakesoft.com> <3C540A90.5020904@evision-ventures.com> <20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com>
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:46:42 -0700
Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > I would like to notice that the changes in 2.4.18-pre7 to the
> > tulip eth driver are apparently causing absymal performance drops
> > on my version of this card.
>
> Well, from what I know 'tulip' driver in later 2.4 kernels simply does
> NOT work with any of my tulip cards, on x86 or on alpha, with a version
> higher that something like 0.9.14a (which was yet in 2.4.6-ac4, I think;
> I may have versions details wrong at this moment and would have to do
> some digging to be sure). In other words its performance is unable to
> drop any lower does not matter what I will do.
Hm, maybe you should shortly state which vendor (OEM or the like) you are
using. I generally cannot confirm any problems with tulip-driver in 2.4.
I use a wide variety of cards including 4 port cards, very old 21041 DLink,
the former DFE-series etc.
Maybe this is a specific problem with a certain vendor or board type?
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-27 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-26 17:15 question about sparc 64-bit user land Felix von Leitner
2002-01-26 17:24 ` Ben Collins
2002-01-26 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 14:11 ` CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7 Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 16:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 17:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 17:53 ` root
2002-01-27 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-28 12:06 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-28 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-27 18:46 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-27 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-28 3:40 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-26 18:07 ` question about sparc 64-bit user land Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020127225845.1bc1453a.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal@harddata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.